Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You want to contend again, right?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I don't see how keeping TD around in a reduced roll for a reasonable salary could hurt this team. Changing of the guard would mean new GM and coaching staff.

I see it as a mentality.  Keeping TD around would make players feel like "well, they still have TD..." To clarify: You have a Young LB and TD.  Young LB is the starter, and in the back of their mind there's the legendary TD.  They compete, compete, compete all off season.  The whole time, the specter of TD coming in at any second gnaws at the back of that young LB's mind.  He's also a crutch for the team.  All aging vets end up as crutches.  Why go to the new guy when we have good old reliable?

The shot has been fired, and the locker room has heard it.  Get hungry and take a job.  TD is beloved by the team and fan base, but keeping him around hampers some of the youth movements because he's always an easy replacement for a young guy who struggles instead of giving that young guy a chance to redeem themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They didn’t want him anymore. That doesn’t mean any sort of brilliant philosophical shift is on the horizon. 

I’d love nothing more than to see Tepper have success here. But I’m not gonna put this move into that equation, good or bad. 

This doesn’t suddenly make us the 2003 patriots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, je1005 said:

They didn’t want him anymore. That doesn’t mean any sort of brilliant philosophical shift is on the horizon. 

I’d love nothing more than to see Tepper have success here. But I’m not gonna put this move into that equation, good or bad. 

This doesn’t suddenly make us the 2003 patriots. 

No but it shows a glimmer of hope that Hurney is learning. Old Hurney would have given him a 3-5 year deal worth way too much because he wants the players to like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not gonna sit here and praise Marty for being less stupid than usual.

I’m not devastated over TD leaving. It is a business, indeed. Just trying to look at this like a reasonable adult.

Turning away a franchise icon when his skills haven’t eroded nearly as much as advertised doesn’t suddenly make your franchise a no-nonsense juggernaut. I believe/hope the thinking here is a philosophical shift to more 5/6 DB packages. Davis was REPEATEDLY asked to cover slot receivers vs 10 personnel. That’s on Ron/Eric. 

Many fans look at this like it’s either has to be “mom ‘n pop” or “cutthroat alley”. Neither one of those extremes are sustainable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I don't see how keeping TD around in a reduced roll for a reasonable salary could hurt this team. Changing of the guard would mean new GM and coaching staff.

This is the part we dont know.  We dont know what he expected for compensation, and we dont know what was offered. All we know is that TD wants and thinks he can play at a level this team was not willing to pay for. So many are blaming the team as if they forced him out.  Would TD accept a reduced role? Would he accept Vet Min?  Would he accept a 1 year deal for slightly above vet min?  We dont know what was offered, and in my opinion more importantly....what TD turned down from the Panthers. 

 

Keeping TD around in a reduced role does not sound like the TD we saw in the twitter video that believed he still has alot to give and can still play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, the Panthers were contenders until the secondary and pass rush disappeared, and the quarterback’s arm fell off.

Shifting away from your veteran core is a necessary part of the business, but it’s not going to help matters in any short term capacity. 

It’s funny, we’re gonna be having this discussion about Cam in a couple of years. He’s not a young 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, je1005 said:

To be fair, the Panthers were contenders until the secondary and pass rush disappeared, and the quarterback’s arm fell off.

Shifting away from your veteran core is a necessary part of the business, but it’s not going to help matters in any short term capacity. 

It’s funny, we’re gonna be having this discussion about Cam in a couple of years. He’s not a young 30.

Cam wont last as long as TD as a Panther. Like it or not.  This team has ridden Cam like a mule these years. He wont last 14 years with the Panthers, and frankly i wouldnt blame him one bit if he signed with another team. Gimpy shoulder and all, the Panthers have literally done NOTHING todevelop him as a QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...