Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The problem with keeping Rivera . . .


BrianS

Recommended Posts

Obviously, we need a DC.  However, it's obvious to anyone with eyes that Rivera's seat is going to start out warm next season, and he's in the last year of his contract.  What quality DC would want to come here under those circumstances?  Can we even get anyone better than Washington, given our situation?  Honestly, either Rivera needs to be out or he needs to be extended if we want to have any chance of recruiting quality coaches to supplement the staff.  This seems like a really tough situation when looked at as a whole.  We need a lot of help on the defensive coaching side, and a lame duck coach isn't likely to get the sort of help we need.

Thoughts?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Rivera will either continue to coach the defense or he will bring back Wilkes. Also a great defensive coach that sees the possibility of replacing Rivera if he is fired mid season or next season would want to come here

I don't understand why he can't take over the D, he shouldn't and don't do anything else. Shouldn't be involved in the offense, can't manage the clock right and suck at deciding who should or shouldn't get snaps. The least he could do is ensure the defense is taken care of

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  I just don’t want Ron choosing anymore players to fit his antiquated schemes. We draft a 4-3 DE and the next coach changes to 3-4. Box Safeties. Piss poor evaluation. 

 I place a part of the credit/blame on all defensive personnel decisions on Rivera. No matter who is GM? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

Obviously, we need a DC.  However, it's obvious to anyone with eyes that Rivera's seat is going to start out warm next season, and he's in the last year of his contract.  What quality DC would want to come here under those circumstances?  Can we even get anyone better than Washington, given our situation?  Honestly, either Rivera needs to be out or he needs to be extended if we want to have any chance of recruiting quality coaches to supplement the staff.  This seems like a really tough situation when looked at as a whole.  We need a lot of help on the defensive coaching side, and a lame duck coach isn't likely to get the sort of help we need.

Thoughts?

 

Has anyone thought about the offensive line?  I hear a lot of discussion about the Defense. I do not disagree. I just have not heard any conversations regarding the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...