Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Isn’t it ironic...


TN05

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

Plain and simple we played just as many backups as they did.. And now ppl are bitching because the backups won..lol

It's because these people are miserable people who are never happy about everything. 

The dirty secret is these people actually love it when we lose. It gives them something to distract from their meaningless, banal lives and lets them feel superior for a few minutes online. We could win the Super Bowl and these people wouldn't be happy, because nothing makes them happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

Plain and simple we played just as many backups as they did.. And now ppl are bitching because the backups won..lol

That's not even remotely true. We played our entire starting defense, besides Short for a large portion of the game. We also played every starter we could on offense. Sean Payton took out I think six players after a single drive. That's not accounting for the 3 or 4 players he already had inactive, including both starting tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

Plain and simple we played just as many backups as they did.. And now ppl are bitching because the backups won..lol

Also, who gives a poo who we're playing. I stated the SAINTS did not try to win. They sat their most important players, and schemed a game against their players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

That's not even remotely true. We played our entire starting defense, besides Short for a large portion of the game. We also played every starter we could on offense. 

Except Funchess and McCaffery and our starting quarterback and our Pro Bowl guard... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TN05 said:

Except Funchess and McCaffery and our starting quarterback and our Pro Bowl guard... 

Funchess is trash. McCaffrey started, but Ron took him out after almost getting injured, but then was willing to play him at quarterback. Oh, and Trai is hurt.

But who fuging cares, the Saints took out so many healthy starters, BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT THE RECORD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

That's not even remotely true. We played our entire starting defense, besides Short for a large portion of the game. We also played every starter we could on offense. Sean Payton took out I think six players after a single drive. That's not accounting for the 3 or 4 players he already had inactive, including both starting tackles.

They played most of their starting defense longer than ours.. And their number 1 WR TE and 2 RB played more than ours.. What did you want to do?? Find a HS team to take our place today??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sub Zero said:

They played most of their starting defense longer than ours.. And their number 1 WR TE and 2 RB played more than ours.. What did you want to do?? Find a HS team to take our place today??

The Saints didn't play Brees, didn't play Kamara, and didn't want to win. If you want to make the argument that they seriously cared about this record, keep doing so, but it's simply not logical. Their best two players on offense were sat, the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

The Saints didn't play Brees, didn't play Kamara, and didn't want to win. If you want to make the argument that they seriously cared about this record, keep doing so, but it's simply not logical. Their best two players on offense were sat, the end.

And we played our 4th QB .. Again did you want Ron to asked Jake if he could take some snaps??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...