Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fantasy Football Championship Discussion


Shocker

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

I’m torn between starting Matt Ryan or Kirk Cousins. 

My opponent has Thielen. 

You could hedge with Cousins but he is my backup and has really been bad lately and did not do well first game vs Detroit.  In a dome though.  Tough call.

I would maybe go with Ryan...he has had a really good stat year very quietly. #2 QB in FF this season.  Also, very mild 57 tomorrow and should be clear nice day.  Ryan will probably have a nice day.  When I take out emotions he will light up the Panthers in this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Thank you for this I’m in a pickle for my game. It’s PPR and my finally wr spot is tricky: DJ, Mike Williams, Robert Foster or Adam Humphries? Need help haha

I’d go with Mike here...who knows what DJ will do with Taylor at QB.  Rivers to Williams is hot right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

That’s fair, my only thing there is Williams hasn’t done much all year except last week. 

Totally agree...he has been banged up...looks like Rivers is really targeting him lately, they need him.  You are looking for TDs from him...not much RAC.  Still this late with those options he is solid.  Also, Baltimore defensive secondary is really tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Which QBs are available?  There a Jets WR that is hot...and worth a pick up.

theres nothing but absolite scrubs

 

Heinicke is my best shot at high points so ive committed to him 

 

theres 14 teams of 29 roster spots each. the FA list is barren and its beautiful. i comb that poo every week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...