Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we head into a uncapped year, would we Franchise Peppers again?


charlottenian

Recommended Posts

A lot of it depends on what he does this year. With the way he is playing right now he is earning himself his last BIG payday. There is a good chance that they will Franchise him just for trade value, if he keeps playing at this level someone is going to jump at the chance to get him.

He is getting a little age on him but he is in great shape and there is no reason he could not play another 5 years, easy. I wouldn't be suprised to see them tag him again regardless of the cap situation. With another 14-15 sack season someone would be willing to give up a first + for him. The only thing that kept him around this year was his 2.5 sack '07 and the way he went about trying to get out of here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there is no cap, would the big cat give Hurney the go ahead to franchise Julius again?

2010 - little doubt

2011 - IF we get a new CBA that includes the same rules as the current one in regards to tagging players, Peppers will cost 30 million. That would probably be well over the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not an easy decision to make. There are so many variables that play into this.

1) How does Peppers play this year?

2).Does he sign a new contract and make this question not relevant?

3) Knowing now that Pep apologized for his past play, this warrants a new perspective on Pep overall, this affects both points 1 and 2. If he steps his game up, you definitely want an all-pro player on your team. This also could dismiss the idea that Pep doesn't want to play in Carolina, and takes up a new contract.

Mostly, my point falls in with #3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...