Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You all are really overestimating the chances Ron is gone


MVPccaffrey

Recommended Posts

On 12/5/2018 at 11:01 PM, Billy_T said:

Hint 1 for you...

Mr. Tepper's DNA is that of a QUANT:  He has a fascination with numbers and fancies himself as having photographic memory.  Quant's are driven by the numbers, the facts, and do their best to eliminate "emotion" from decision making (unlike keyboard jockeys & kneejerk dolts).  

Key Takeaway -- Mr. Tepper will value 3 NFC South rings/4 playoffs/51 regular season wins in 7 years, more than he will be worried about a 4 game losing streak where the star QB has been playing with a bad wing.

While I agree that Tepper's decision will come down to Rivera's entire body of work, there are a few things that as a fan I'm hoping he gives careful consideration - and this is just based on my observations from the arm chair:

1) Culture - the overall culture of this team appears to be an acceptance of mediocrity. With the exception of 2002-3 and 2015 (both SB appearances), this team under Rivera and Fox has more often than not underachieved and has an "we'll be okay", "ho-hum" attitude toward losing. Yes, they've spouted all the cliches about "missed opportunities", need to play with more urgency, better discipline, etc., but we haven't seen these translate to their play on the field. Additionally, this team has ALWAYS (with a few exceptions e.g. 2015 Dallas game and NFC championship game, etc.) appear to lay an egg when the lights are the brightest. We've always embraced the underdog role yet appear to have problems dealing with success or high expectations. If I'm Tepper (which clearly I'm not), is this the culture I want for my team? Is this the brand I want associated with a winning team?

2) Consistency - inconsistency appears to be the only constant with this team. We appear to be making the same mistakes e.g. untimely penalties, clock mismanagement, lack of adjustments, situational playcalling for as long as I can remember. I agree that much of this is on the players - Cam Newton still throwing into double and triple coverage or poor mechanics comes to mind - but most of this falls on coaching or lack thereof. Also, the apparent lack of preparation that has reared it's ugly head very prominently the last few weeks also falls on coaching. Is there any reason to be believe another year under Rivera will fix the problem after this has been our MO dating back to the Fox era and continuing under Rivera's watch?

3) Personnel - the team's draft and FA history speaks for itself. We have great players like Cam, R Kalil, KK, Luke, TD, Olsen and now McCaffrey and Moore. However, for every one of these great players there have been twice the number of players that haven't panned out. Player evaluation has never appeared to be Rivera's strong suit - see Amini Silatolu - and certain players have for whatever reason found their way into his doghouse when they could've had more opportunities to contribute  (we're still waiting on the honest long look of Cameron Artis-Payne after 3+ seasons). Is there any reason to believe that this will improve beyond this year and under this same regime? 

Again, these are just the observations of a guy behind a computer screen that happens to be a longtime fan. In the final analysis, it's Tepper's team to do what he decides is best to build a winning team. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2018 at 10:01 PM, Billy_T said:

Hint 1 for you...

Mr. Tepper's DNA is that of a QUANT:  He has a fascination with numbers and fancies himself as having photographic memory.  Quant's are driven by the numbers, the facts, and do their best to eliminate "emotion" from decision making (unlike keyboard jockeys & kneejerk dolts).  

Key Takeaway -- Mr. Tepper will value 3 NFC South rings/4 playoffs/51 regular season wins in 7 years, more than he will be worried about a 4 game losing streak where the star QB has been playing with a bad wing.

51,wins in 7 years?  That’s not very good. That comes out to an average of 7-9 which is the definition of mediocrity and a losing record 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Camp Fodder said:

51,wins in 7 years?  That’s not very good. That comes out to an average of 7-9 which is the definition of mediocrity and a losing record 

It's also wrong.  Coach Rivera has 64 regular season wins through his first 7 seasons, which is a winning record

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Camvp said:

It's also wrong.  Coach Rivera has 64 regular season wins through his first 7 seasons, which is a winning record

What's his record if you take out the Gettleman years?

I've felt bad for Rivera because it seems like he's genuinely a nice guy, but watching the way this season is breaking down, I'm over it.

He needs to be gone, and he should take Marty Hurney with him.

It's time to start over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

What's his record if you take out the Gettleman years?

I've felt bad for Rivera because it seems like he's genuinely a nice guy, but watching the way this season is breaking down, I'm over it.

He needs to be gone, and he should take Marty Hurney with him.

It's time to start over.

I agree. I truly believe Rivera is a genuinely nice guy and a good coach. However, Super Bowl season aside, there's too much inconsistency during his tenure and the organization could use a change in culture.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2018 at 4:33 PM, Camvp said:

According to this forum that's never happened, when we win it's because of players, mostly Cam credited, and coaching credit is only assigned when the team loses.

Name one coaching decision that seemed like a great call by Ron. Only time I remember is when Cam and basically the whole offense telling him to let them stay on the field for a 4th down conversion. I have seen Olsen and Luke coaching him up instead of vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2018 at 1:18 PM, Green_Tea said:

From the Saints forum. 

"RR is not the biggest problem that franchise has. Cam Newton is a horrible qb and he has the blind loyalty of a large part of the organisation and fan base. The dudes career stats is right on par with the great Jay Cutler! They are paying a (pretty average) running back 20 mil a year to try and throw the football. There are some rough years ahead for that organisation and fan base."

Of course they will say that. They don't want us to get better. They want to keep representing the south. Cam has his issues but it isn't bc he his a subpar QB its bc of a boneheaded coach who didn't have enough balls to pull Cam in a meaningless game in 2016 when he knew his throwing arm was damaged, and then in a straight loss to Steelers this yr kept him in knowing he was hurt kept him and aging hurt Olsen. Ya keep reading saints forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...