Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You're the BEST!


PanthersATL

Recommended Posts

As we get to the end of 2018 (year-wise and season-wise), a few writers are whipping together "Worst NFL Moves for all 32 Teams" lists -- https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2807837-reviewing-every-nfl-teams-worst-move-from-this-past-offseason#slide5 is just one example.

Sure, we can dogpile onto all the worst things we see every week. That's easy.  But let's go the positive route here...

  • What's the SINGLE BEST change the Panthers have made this season?

I'll start:

  • Norv Turner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Best move: Eric Reid. His play aside, the signing has helped trim the fat of this fan base and hopefully will continue to run off the racists, bigots, and insecure snowflakes that plague this franchise. Hopefully the fake fans will continue to jump ship. 

No Panthers fans have stopped being fans because Reid was signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, t96 said:

Honestly I think it was drafting Donte. Norv may be gone with Rivera soon but my God Donte is going to be a stud here for years.

And it took Ron drafting a guy "he wouldn't usually draft" to get him. How many players of those types of players have we missed out on over the years because Ron is a ninny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

And it took Ron drafting a guy "he wouldn't usually draft" to get him. How many players of those types of players have we missed out on over the years because Ron is a ninny.

Well he did draft him... I liked DG but his weird fetish with size was a pretty big flaw, and I think he played a role in us not drafting players like Donte from ‘13-‘17.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...