Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are defensive head coaches a thing of the NFL past?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Not yet. Other than the Eagles winning last year against a defensive minded coach, you had 2 defensive coaches in the Super Bowl the previous year (ATL and NE). Before that, you had Rivera and Denver, which was fueled by their defense. 

It seems that when the cream rises to the top, you either have a defensive coach or a team with a strong defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, but they are at a disadvantage due to the rules changes over the years.   They are going to have to reinvent the defensive scheme required to compensate for or practically eliminate that advantage.   The person that figures that out will be in high demand.  Basically, he has to have a solid background in both offense and defense with the ability to adapt both.

 

Good luck finding that person or persons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, beastson said:

Since 2015 starting with us, the highest scoring offensive NFC team goes to the Superbowl. Barring injury, expect to the Saints or Rams in the SB

Meanwhile we proceeded to drop to top 15 since then

2017 Eagles had the 4th ranked D

2016 Patriots 8th ranked D

Both teams had a good balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily.  Pete Carroll and Bill Bellichik are both "defensive" head coaches, the difference is they are both willing to let progressive offensive coaches take over that side of the ball and even be in control if need be.  Rivera still imposes his will of conservatism on the play calls.  At the end of the day, A defensive head coach can help shut down a team with lesser talent on that side of the ball, but you need to not be a complete next level scat eating moron on offense.  Also, defensive head coaches don't piss away a once in a lifetime talent on defense like Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, Rivera isn't just a defensive coach. He's a "play it safe" coach.

I'll grant for most people that terminology is interchangeable, but there are exceptions. Mike Tomlin is a defensive coach without being a fraidy cat. I think a guy like that can still be successful.

If you look across the current landscape of the league though...yeah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it will be a transition year will be a playoff team (more grindy and young blood) but not a top contender... but in 25-26 back to being a contender IMO Nickishin will be ready to do day 1 IMO.... and if we can get some of these young guys the experience/development FUS/Blake/Nadeu/Morrow 
    • in itself i didn't/don't have an issue with this. And our main point has always been that we didn't want to be one of the go for it all teams at the deadline because we have a window that has term with Slavin/Aho/Svech/Jarvy.  however. keeping martinook above market value and not combining the youth influx with things like changing things at goalie and or signing a big name as a guentz replacement just feels like so far we're kind of sitting this out, and i really dont like the idea of taking a large step backwards from pre deadline roster last year. i understand we've given this a run with the same guys and it hasn't worked and changing some things there. but we also know exactly what our glaring issues are. so to not get better at those while also getting worse/losing big time names in other areas is pretty disheartening thus far. Hope there's more to come.
    • It looks like next year is going to be the year that a lot of young guys get a chance.
×
×
  • Create New...