Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why was Anderson not utilized


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Never used him to his potential and then cut him after warming the bench. They do not have a power back at all. Amah is needed to help this Oline get push and open holes on running plays.

Payne and Barner are not exactly bruisers. Along the same mold as CMC, but not nearly as talented. They lost the ability to have the option to mix up the running game. Sure he got pissed off and wanted out after having a thousand yard season in 2017.

Just another reason why Rivera (and Norv), both screwed the pooch. Look what the Saints do with their combo and it is very effective. They should have worked him in instead of laying it all on CMC. Sooner or later the effects of playing  97% of snaps will take its toll. 

Leaves me to believe that these guys really don't have a clue on how to utilize players.....Norv less so then Rivera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of all the things do criticize the coaching staff for, this ain't it. It's not like Anderson didn't get his chances, I remember him bobbling one right into the defenses hands. The bottom line is that Christian McCaffrey is a fuging unicorn. We have never had a playmaker like him in franchise history, yes even Smitty. It would be coaching malpractice to take him off the field for any other reason than he needs a blow. We don't need a "two back" offense or a redzone back, we have Cam Newton. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FugAllY'all said:

Of all the things do criticize the coaching staff for, this ain't it. It's not like Anderson didn't get his chances, I remember him bobbling one right into the defenses hands. The bottom line is that Christian McCaffrey is a fuging unicorn. We have never had a playmaker like him in franchise history, yes even Smitty. It would be coaching malpractice to take him off the field for any other reason than he needs a blow. We don't need a "two back" offense or a redzone back, we have Cam Newton. 

That may be true, but that unicorn couldn’t bust up the middle at the goal line and get the tough yards when it counted yesterday.

He also fumbled three times because we are using him like a battering ram with reckless abandon.

That’s on the staff.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FugAllY'all said:

Of all the things do criticize the coaching staff for, this ain't it. It's not like Anderson didn't get his chances, I remember him bobbling one right into the defenses hands. The bottom line is that Christian McCaffrey is a fuging unicorn. We have never had a playmaker like him in franchise history, yes even Smitty. It would be coaching malpractice to take him off the field for any other reason than he needs a blow. We don't need a "two back" offense or a redzone back, we have Cam

Don't agree at all. Cam is a running QB... period. He is one injury away from being unable to be the '2nd running back'.

Have no faith in Payne or Barner to carry the load if CMC gets nicked up or hurt. Anderson could have been the guy to go to if this came to pass.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it has a lot to do with Ron Rivera's MO.

Rivera is a "find one thing that works and run it into the ground" type of coach. That's why even during times when there's nothing to be gained by keeping Cam Newton in the game, he's still out there.

The same now applies to McCaffrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I think it has a lot to do with Ron Rivera's MO.

Rivera is a "find one thing that works and run it into the ground" type of coach. That's why even during times when there's nothing to be gained by keeping Cam Newton in the game, he's still out there.

The same now applies to McCaffrey.

And why we walked into and out of the Super Bowl with no wrinkles, no adjustments, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because coaching.

Yeah I wouldn't say we're losing lately because of not using Anderson, but we never used him correctly and yes he COULD have provided a wrinkle we can use.    He's also a great pass catcher.     I expected more creativity with him when we signed him.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've had this topic a million times. It's pretty clear the Panthers want CMC to be on the field as much as possible, even when he's exhausted. He's extremely productive but my guess is Anderson (rightly so) wanted more playing time and the panthers weren't interested in that prospect. 

Also Anderson did have a huge mistake early in the season in the Atlanta game. My guess is between that gaff and his general attitude he landed himself in Rivera's doghouse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...