A whole lot of Panthers can play the X actually.

[PhillyB]

6 hours ago, leoslayer said:

The X has never been the possession receiver.

 

The X is the playmaker.

Moss,Rice,Swann,Julio, ETC

you're right, Z is the flanker 

ron is still retarded

[Darvinsun]

35 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

you're right, Z is the flanker 

ron is still retarded

By no means is Funchess a playmaker. Playkiller now I will co sign that.

[tiger7_88]

10 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

I noticed someone say Funchess is the only receiver capable of playing the X position 

 

Apparently, many can.

 

 

In other words, in Rivera-thinking, either Funchess or Smith.

[tiger7_88]

10 hours ago, PhillyB said:

is an archetype

You just described the Carolina Panthers head coach.

In one word.

[electro's horse]

Just now, tiger7_88 said:

You just described the Carolina Panthers head coach.

In one word.

are you thinking of archon?

[emhoward]

I know I had mentioned it. It was my attempt at giving Rivera the benefit of the doubt for not benching Funchess. 

Perhaps he is that clueless smh

[rodeo]

i have to agree with ron on this one, not that funchess has any business being the x but that we don't have 1 receiver perfect for the role. moore is successful when he has a free release, which he's only gotten when moved around. if he's the x he will never make it off the line, he's had major problems. samuel is our closest thing and should be handed the role on a platter but i would still have questions.