Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You want to know why Moore and Samuel weren’t on the field together?


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

According to our HC who has won two COTY awards it’s because when you have them both on the field you have to figure out who is getting the ball.

Good god, Ron is a fugging idiot.

”Too many weapons on offense is bad!” proclaimed Mo-Ron Rivera!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

According to our HC who has won two COTY awards it’s because when you have them both on the field you have to figure out who is getting the ball.

 

All this time we’re thinking Samuel didn’t wear a tie or maybe he forgot to zip up and Ron saw his undies. 

You REALLY think that's the reason... You guys I tell yea... Norv has game planned differently almost every single game this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was Person who also asked if Ron would like to get them on the field more and his response was 

“I want to see them continue to do the things they’re doing”. 

Ron is freaking killing me with this crap. There are plenty of coaches in this league who would kill for guys like Moore and Samuel and would figure out how to get them on the field AT THE SAME TIME. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

On Curtis Samuel’s 11 snaps when he was out on a pass play, Cam threw it to him 7 times.

Sounds like our QB is smart enough to know who needs the ball. I’m sure he can manage two exceptional receivers playing at the same time.

poo, I hate it when Saca is right and he is! :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron is paying for the Uber, Norv is the one actually driving. 

Do you guys seriously think Ron is on the sideline going, "hold on, hold on, get 12 out of this play, 10 is already out there".   Norv has final say on play construction, 90%+ of the game plan and 100% play calls.  That means he knows exactly who is on the field for that play.

I get (sort of) the condemnation of Ron for going for the road win,  but how long does Norv hold the halo you guys have constructed?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of mature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.  Just so you know, I critique and perform research in my job.  I am often amazed at how the numbers do not support my suppositions.  I learned that my impression is often wrong until I look at the data.  In this case, I have considered all the important variables and he should get a shot.  Numbers don't lie--and when you and others resort to twisted name calling directed toward the poster--it verifies my position.  
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...