Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is there any reason Samuel is only playing like 25% of the snaps???


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

I’m not sure what more he has to do to work his way into the field. For everyone that’s says”the best players always play” doesn’t know this team. His touchdown to opportunity rate has to be amazing at this point. He has shown the ability to win in the big and small game(lost in the big game jump ball as well).

At this point it’s not DJ Moore Vs Curtis Samuel as both are good football players. A good head coach would see the film and say hey, we gotta get these guys the ball more instead of Funchess getting 7-8 targets and dropping half of them. For most of the game I thought Samuel was being disciplined or was injured. 

I don’t think I can stomach another week of Samuel playing 15 plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont remember anytime during Rivera's tenure that we have demoted an established player. I remember trading Beason to Giants to allow Luke to play his natural MLB position. For Samuel to get more than 15% of the snaps, we have to cut into Funchess' snaps, which I am in favor of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think after this last game he should pass Goonchess on the depth chart. If #10 and #12 arent on the field the majority of the plays, we know the staff either doesnt care about winning or absolutely clueless on how to do so. I think #13 has played well given his role, I dont want to reduce his role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

I’m not sure what more he has to do to work his way into the field. For everyone that’s says”the best players always play” doesn’t know this team. His touchdown to opportunity rate has to be amazing at this point. He has shown the ability to win in the big and small game(lost in the big game jump ball as well).

At this point it’s not DJ Moore Vs Curtis Samuel as both are good football players. A good head coach would see the film and say hey, we gotta get these guys the ball more instead of Funchess getting 7-8 targets and dropping half of them. For most of the game I thought Samuel was being disciplined or was injured. 

I don’t think I can stomach another week of Samuel playing 15 plays.

Because of Funchess & Smith being on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...