Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jerry Richardson may as well still be the owner.


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

I mentioned it in the gameday thread but the leadership of this team still runs like this is JR’s team. 

Nothing is going to change until we clean house of everyone associated with JR. Ron is the prototypical Richardson coach. Hurney, even though I have liked most of what he has done since coming back, never deserved a second chance and is literally just a pawn JR placed back in the organization before finally selling the team. The Norv hire was solid but about 5 years too late in typical JR Panthers fashion. I am tired of watching the careers of super talented players waste away because of trying to uphold some fake tradition and standard that Jerry Richardson built the team around. The NFL is evolving and it is currently leaving the Richardson Panthers in the dust. 

It’s time for Tepper to clean house and truly make this team his own and bring a new era of Panthers football to the Carolinas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coming from someone who was far from a Hurney fan, he's like damn near the bottom of "guys who deserve blame for this season".  Our best defensive player this season was drafted by Hurney (Jackson).  Reid had a missed tackle today but still made some good hits and Hurney brought him in.  Hurney drafted the best offensive player on the field today not named Newton (DJ Moore... hell he drafted Newton too).

I don't think we'd bring Hurney back if we also fired Rivera, but he shouldn't be mentioned.  Quite frankly talent isn't the issue with this team other than defensive end (and really nothing Hurney could have done about that) and the left side of the offensive line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jesse said:

Did you forget he was appointed ownership this Spring? What do you expect him to do, fire the GM, head coach, and assistant coaches a couple months before camp? Also Norv was hired in January, well after Tepper became the owner.

Based on what has unfolded this season it’s looking like that’s exactly what he should have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...