Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Video: Ron Rivera on why he went for two


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Mage said:

In 2013, we were playing the Buffalo Bills.  It was about a 1:30 left in the game.  We were leading 20-17.  It was 4th and 1 at the Bills 21 yard line.  Instead of going for it, Rivera opts to kick the field goal (about the same distance as an XP) to put us up 23-17.  Bills drive down the field in 1 minute and win the game.  

Everyone lambasted Rivera.  And don't a single person in this forum who was here in 2013 deny it.  Everyone was pissed.  "Why be so conservative?  Good coaches go for the win!"  Like, anyone who was here will tell you that was as heated as the Panthers forum had been.  It was after that game that Riverboat Ron became a thing.

Now 5 years later, Rivera is being criticized for going for the win instead of settling for the tie/XP/kick.  Hilarious.  But people tell me they wouldn't criticize him if he went for the XP and we lost?  A damn lie.  History proves that.

That isn't the only game either.  Who remembers the reaction to the Falcons game in 2012?  

4th and 1 on the Falcons 45 with 1:44 left to go.  It was a tie game.  Instead of going for it, Panthers wasted clock and let the clock run down to 1:09 before taking a delay of game and punting it.  Falcons drove down the field and kicked a FG to win in less than a minute.  

People were pissed.  "Why play for the tie?  Go for it with Cam and get the win!"  But now people mad Rivera ain't play for the tie?

Come on now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mage said:

In 2013, we were playing the Buffalo Bills.  It was about a 1:30 left in the game.  We were leading 20-17.

Looks like somebody thinks he's making a point using utterly incomparable situations.

Please so tell me, even IF the situations were comparable (which they were not), what are the percentages of the Carolina Panthers with Cam Newton as their QB picking up a 4th and 1?  Then follow that up with telling me what are the percentages of the Carolina Panthers with Cam Newton as their QB picking up a 2-pt conversion?

Dis gon' be gud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mage said:

In 2013, we were playing the Buffalo Bills.  It was about a 1:30 left in the game.  We were leading 20-17.  It was 4th and 1 at the Bills 21 yard line.  Instead of going for it, Rivera opts to kick the field goal (about the same distance as an XP) to put us up 23-17.  Bills drive down the field in 1 minute and win the game.  

Everyone lambasted Rivera.  And don't a single person in this forum who was here in 2013 deny it.  Everyone was pissed.  "Why be so conservative?  Good coaches go for the win!"  Like, anyone who was here will tell you that was as heated as the Panthers forum had been.  It was after that game that Riverboat Ron became a thing.

Now 5 years later, Rivera is being criticized for going for the win instead of settling for the tie/XP/kick.  Hilarious.  But people tell me they wouldn't criticize him if he went for the XP and we lost?  A damn lie.  History proves that.

Jesus fuging Christ, we were in the lead.

not comparable at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mage said:

That isn't the only game either.  Who remembers the reaction to the Falcons game in 2012?  

4th and 1 on the Falcons 45 with 1:44 left to go.  It was a tie game.  Instead of going for it, Panthers wasted clock and let the clock run down to 1:09 before taking a delay of game and punting it.  Falcons drove down the field and kicked a FG to win in less than a minute.  

People were pissed.  "Why play for the tie?  Go for it with Cam and get the win!"  But now people mad Rivera ain't play for the tie?

Come on now.  

Your playing fore win and ending all chances of a comeack in the bills game and you have the best short yardage Qb in the league. Field goal just keeps them from getting a field goal to tie it. To win the game the game they still needed a 3rd to win it so the extra 3 points did not matter. Put the game away with your short yardage game.

Falcons the same 1 us you have the best shortage Qb in the game. Falcons have a stout offense you can' let Matt Ryan have the ball back either more than 30 secs for field goal range to win the game  he is good at that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How was this not the right call? I was begging for it before we scored. People are saying take the higher percentage shot, thinking it’s the extra point, but why are we not accounting for the two chip shots that were missed. 

If Ron called extra point and Gano missed it, everyone would be asking for his head because he should’ve gone for two. He can’t come out and say...’we went for two because Gano sucked today’. 

The call was the right call, and it sucks it wasn’t converted. But, Funchess and Gano lost this game. I was screaming at the tv to take Funchess out of the game. The least Ron could do was to take Gano out of the game to give us a chance at winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tiger7_88 said:

Looks like somebody thinks he's making a point using utterly incomparable situations.

Please so tell me, even IF the situations were comparable (which they were not), what are the percentages of the Carolina Panthers with Cam Newton as their QB picking up a 4th and 1?  Then follow that up with telling me what are the percentages of the Carolina Panthers with Cam Newton as their QB picking up a 2-pt conversion?

Dis gon' be gud.

It’s a 1 yard difference lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I support the call, but at the same time there's zero chance you make that call unless your kicker has been spraying the ball all over the place all day... which ours had.

...and you're defense has been allowing your opponent to move the ball at will, which ours had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mage said:

It’s a 1 yard difference lmao

Its a 1-yard difference but, again, you try to compare two situations which are incomparable.

The 2-yard conversion was at the 2-yard line with the defense having only to defend the end-zone and the team 1 point behind.  Failure means losing the game.

The 1-yard conversion was (as you pointed out) at the 21 yard line with the defense having to defend the entire red-zone plus a QB sneak with the team 3 points ahead.  Failure means the team is still 3 points in the lead.

Its stunning to me how someone has to point out to you that these two situations are in no way, shape, or form, comparable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

All that matters is the end result.  Since we lost, it was not the right call.

It was the right decision but not executed well. They are not the same at all. The result doesn't mean the decision was wrong simply the result was a loss. If we tied it and they went down the field and kicked a field goal would that decision have been wrong too? Honestly I think it was the right call but executed poorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

"I think you go for two on the road to win the game."

 

I cannot recall him ever doing this before.

 

 

In 2016 season (game played in 2017 since it was the last game of the year), last game of the season against the bucs, he went for 2 on the last play of the season on the road in tampa.  FWIW, also didn't convert there.  There was nothing on the line though like there was for this game.

Edit to add the video of that uneventful game

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CatMan72 said:

...and you're defense has been allowing your opponent to move the ball at will, which ours had.

Stop.  You're just wrong.

image.png.b4f348a150951c16cdd1d73b8f8e1b6f.png

That's the Lions drive chart.  How many drives more than 10 plays?  Yea, 3.  They were not driving "at will" by any means.  Only three times all game did the Lions move the ball more than 50 yards.  Only four times did they move it the 40 yards that would have been required to go from their 25 to our 35 for a long field goal attempt to win.

Our defense wasn't great yesterday, but neither was the Lions offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • QUARTERBACKS (10): Marc Bulger, Randall Cunningham, Jake Delhomme, Doug Flutie, Rich Gannon, Jeff Garcia, Donovan McNabb, Eli Manning, Steve McNair, Tony Romo RUNNING BACKS (31): Shaun Alexander, Terry Allen, Jamal Anderson, Tiki Barber, Larry Centers (FB), Jamaal Charles, Stephen Davis, Corey Dillon, Warrick Dunn, Charlie Garner, Eddie George, Priest Holmes, Steven Jackson, Chris Johnson, Thomas Jones, John Kuhn (FB), Vonta Leach, Dorsey Levens, Jamal Lewis, Marshawn Lynch, Eric Metcalf (also WR/PR/KR), Glyn Milburn (also WR), Lorenzo Neal (FB), Clinton Portis, Tony Richardson (FB), Robert Smith, Darren Sproles (also PR/KR), Fred Taylor*, Chris Warren, Ricky Watters, Ricky Williams WIDE RECEIVERS (21): Anquan Boldin, Donald Driver, Antonio Freeman, Irving Fryar, Torry Holt*, Joe Horn, Chad Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Derrick Mason, Herman Moore, Muhsin Muhammad, Jordy Nelson, Andre Rison, Jimmy Smith, Rod Smith, Steve Smith Sr., Demaryius Thomas, Hines Ward, Reggie Wayne*, Wes Welker, Roddy White TIGHT ENDS (6): Ben Coates, Vernon Davis, Antonio Gates, Jeremy Shockey, *Delanie Walker, Wesley Walls OFFENSIVE LINEMEN (26): Willie Anderson* (T), Bruce Armstrong (T/G), Matt Birk (C), Lomas Brown (T), Ruben Brown (G), Jahri Evans* (G), Travis Frederick (C), Jordan Gross (T), Ryan Kalil (C), Lincoln Kennedy (T), Olin Kreutz (C), T.J. Lang (G/T), Nick Mangold (C), Logan Mankins (G), Tom Nalen (C), Jeff Saturday (C), Mark Schlereth (G/C), Josh Sitton (G), Chris Snee (G), Joe Staley (T), Dave Szott (G), Brian Waters (G), Richmond Webb (T), Erik Williams (T), Steve Wisniewski (G), Marshal Yanda (G) DEFENSIVE LINEMEN (18): John Abraham (DE also LB), Jared Allen* (DE), La'Roi Glover (DT/NT), Casey Hampton (DT/NT), Robert Mathis (DE), Chester McGlockton (DT), Haloti Ngata (DT), Simeon Rice (DE), Clyde Simmons (DE/DT), Justin Smith (DE), Neil Smith (DE), Henry Thomas (DT/NT), Justin Tuck (DE), Ted Washington (NT/DT), Vince Wilfork (DT/NT), Jamal Williams (DT/NT), Kevin Williams (DT), Pat Williams (DT) LINEBACKERS (20): Jessie Armstead, Brendon Ayanbadejo, Cornelius Bennett, Lance Briggs, Keith Brooking, NaVorro Bowman, Tedy Bruschi, Donnie Edwards, James Farrior, London Fletcher, James Harrison, Luke Kuechly, Willie McGinest (also DE), Ken Norton Jr., Julian Peterson, Bill Romanowski, Takeo Spikes, Terrell Suggs, Mike Vrabel, Lee Woodall DEFENSIVE BACKS (18): Eric Allen* (CB), Eric Berry (DB), Antoine Bethea (S), Dré Bly (DB), Kam Chancellor (S), Nick Collins (DB), Antonio Cromartie (CB), DeAngelo Hall (DB), Rodney Harrison* (S), Eugene Robinson (DB), Samari Rolle (DB), Allen Rossum (DB), Bob Sanders (S), Aqib Talib (CB), Earl Thomas (S), Charles Tillman (CB), Troy Vincent (CB), Darren Woodson* (S) PUNTERS/KICKERS (15): David Akers (K), Gary Anderson (K), Darren Bennett (P), Jason Elam (K), Jeff Feagles (P), Jason Hanson (K), John Kasay (K), Sean Landeta (P), Shane Lechler (P), Pat McAfee (P), Brian Moorman (P), Matt Stover (K), Matt Turk (P), Mike Vanderjagt (K), Adam Vinatieri (K) SPECIAL TEAMS (2): Josh Cribbs (KR/PR also WR), Brian Mitchell (KR/PR also RB)
    • That excuse would be interesting if it was really true. In the first halves, we’ve given up 50 points. In the 2nd halves we’ve given up 23 points. Both the Chargers and the Saints scored TDs on their opening drives, before Young even stepped on the field. The Saints scored on every single possession they had until we finally stopped one drive in the 4th quarter. This D has been run over, regardless of how bad Young played.
×
×
  • Create New...