Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This may be the worst defensive play call I have ever seen.


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, CatMan72 said:

Ron is a really good defensive coach, I'm certain he's looking at the calls like WTF too. Washington is in for a long mini-bye week.

Ron Rivera is observing and approving those play calls being installed on the practice field and in game-planning.

Why some of y’all think that Rivera is a coach that doesn’t work intensely with his coordinators and assistants every damn day of the week and somehow just floats around the periphery of his own team with no involvement and devoid of responsibility is just fugging weird.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of think this was a miscommunication on the dline. The call makes sense on third and shirt because you want to seal the short end of the field with bodies, I believe one of the lineman that dropped was supposed to rush, and the linebacker blitzing was supposed to confuse the oline into allowing pressure. Not a horrible call, but terrible execution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/10/2018 at 8:56 AM, tiger7_88 said:

Ron Rivera is observing and approving those play calls being installed on the practice field and in game-planning.

Why some of y’all think that Rivera is a coach that doesn’t work intensely with his coordinators and assistants every damn day of the week and somehow just floats around the periphery of his own team with no involvement and devoid of responsibility is just fugging weird.  

I've been involved in a lot of game planning and you don't go over every single play that will be called (that would be impossible). You mostly discuss concepts based on the opponent and highlight some plays that fit those concepts along with some key situational stuff. It would not only be impossible but totally impractical to discuss every play or even the majority of plays that were going to be called during a game, especially on defense where you're constantly adjusting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/11/2018 at 6:08 AM, Verge said:

I kind of think this was a miscommunication on the dline. The call makes sense on third and shirt because you want to seal the short end of the field with bodies, I believe one of the lineman that dropped was supposed to rush, and the linebacker blitzing was supposed to confuse the oline into allowing pressure. Not a horrible call, but terrible execution. 

 

    Washington has said it was a miscommunication. But Huddlerz go Huddle and just keep blaming the coaches. Agendas, and all that jazz.

 

    There was supposed to be more than 2 guys rushing on that play. It is possible that the players actually messed up. Right?

 

    Nah, let's just blame the coaches. They are the ones you all want fired anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Washington has said it was a miscommunication. But Huddlerz go Huddle and just keep blaming the coaches. Agendas, and all that jazz.

 

    There was supposed to be more than 2 guys rushing on that play. It is possible that the players actually messed up. Right?

 

    Nah, let's just blame the coaches. They are the ones you all want fired anyway. 

Regardless off communication issues, 3 linemen dropped into coverage and our best cover lb Luke was rushing the passer. I doubt Luke fuged up what he was supposed to be doing which mean Washington asked someone on the D line to drop into coverage and Luke to blitz on a 3rd and fuging 3. Even if one d lineman drops into coverage and Luke still blitzes it's a fuging terrible play call.

There is no positive way to spin something this fuging stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Regardless off communication issues, 3 linemen dropped into coverage and our best cover lb Luke was rushing the passer. I doubt Luke fuged up what he was supposed to be doing which mean Washington asked someone on the D line to drop into coverage and Luke to blitz on a 3rd and fuging 3. Even if one d lineman drops into coverage and Luke still blitzes it's a fuging terrible play call.

There is no positive way to spin something this fuging stupid. 

 

    Hard to debate against someone when they speak in absolutes. 

 

    So blitzing Luke is stupid. Dropping DL into coverage is stupid. Which means, no more Zone Blitzes. I guess we need to go back to rushing just the 4 DL, cuz everything else is, well, stupid.

 

   I guess it is just too easy to blame the coaches. 

 

     After all, there is no way a player made the mistake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Hard to debate against someone when they speak in absolutes. 

 

    So blitzing Luke is stupid. Dropping DL into coverage is stupid. Which means, no more Zone Blitzes. I guess we need to go back to rushing just the 4 DL, cuz everything else is, well, stupid.

 

   I guess it is just too easy to blame the coaches. 

 

     After all, there is no way a player made the mistake. 

No not all the time but in that situation it was. It was third and 3. Dropping linemen into coverage  on 3rd and short is just not smart defensive football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

No not all the time but in that situation it was. It was third and 3. Dropping linemen into coverage  on 3rd and short is just not smart defensive football.

 

    The thing is, we don't know what would have happened if the play had been run correctly. It is easy in hindsight to pick the play apart. 

 

    At that point in time, with Ben at QB, confusion is probably the only way you stop them. Give him a look he has not seen, make him take that extra second or so to process what is happening. Then maybe, just maybe, you can stop him.

 

    Or not. They were on a roll. That play was a hot mess. The only thing you can take from that play is that our Defense messed up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CatMan72 said:

I've been involved in a lot of game planning and you don't go over every single play that will be called (that would be impossible). You mostly discuss concepts based on the opponent and highlight some plays that fit those concepts along with some key situational stuff. It would not only be impossible but totally impractical to discuss every play or even the majority of plays that were going to be called during a game, especially on defense where you're constantly adjusting. 

So what you're trying to tell me is that Ron Rivera has *not* read Eric Washington's defensive playbook?

Or you're telling me he *did* read it, but was too dumb to understand the breakdown of the "rush one DL and one LB and drop everybody else into useless coverage"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...