Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers are 1-8 in their last 9 nationally televised games vs. winning teams


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, JakeDel5674 said:

LOL, alrighty. Sureeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. The last time we beat Pitt, was in 1996. Our Defense is average as Hell. So, I don't feel too comfortable about beating them. And LOL at the number 1 offense being the Bucs. Jesus. 

We have played them twice in 8 seasons.... 2010 2-14 record, and 2014 7-8-1 record..... that has little to no bearing on now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CRA said:

Well....I would challenge the breakdown of the games you picked.  I mean you cherry picked in the Bronco Super Bowl and left out the 5 prime time games they won that season.  So if you include the Bronco loss I would think you would need to include those 5 wins. 

and like you mentioned, you then added a loss to a Bronco team that was 0-0.  And as far as actual play? They played well enough to win it.  Hence Gano hitting the first kick.  

Then you added a Raider game that wasn’t prime time I don’t believe. 

So to sum up how I feel? I feel like your post is more a representation of our 2017.  And our 2017 team made life easy on defenses.  Because we had zero speed on offense outside of what was in our backfield.  None.  And despite that, the 2 prime time games we had Olsen (Playoff game and Philly)....we had shots to win and were in them. 

So the real question is....why won’t we win.  We should be in the game with this roster. 

Great points all across. 

Imo we have a better team than the Steelers right now, and are certainly playing better, problem is we are the road team on the short week. That throws a lot of stuff out of the window. 

Would definitely be our most impressive win so far this season if we beat the Steelers in Pittsburgh on a short week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 answers to a couple of questions:

- I used Super Bowl 50 as a cutoff point because that's when the troubles started. Obviously we did a lot better earlier in the 2015 in similar games. 

- Yes, all of those games were nationally televised games. Someone said the Raiders game wasn't nationally televised: it was a 4:25 game with Jim Nantz in the booth and CBS Media had it down as being in the nationally televised window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...