Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fun Bucs Stat

Doc Holiday

By Doc Holiday,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Doc Holiday Veteran

Doc Holiday

Posted
Posted

Bucs lead the NFL in passer rating allowed at 123.8 per game average... 

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-average-team-passer-rating

oh sorry I meant to say their dead last #32! but they’re #1 in my heart! 

Note: Saints and Atlanta are both equally bad at #28 & 29 (Carolina is #11 missing 10 by .1%) we have the best Pass defense in the NFCS by a country mile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

Bucs lead the NFL in passer rating allowed at 123.8 per game average... 

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-average-team-passer-rating

oh sorry I meant to say their dead last #32! but they’re #1 in my heart! 

Note: Saints and Atlanta are both equally bad at #28 & 29 (Carolina is #11 missing 10 by .1%) we have the best Pass defense in the NFCS by a country mile.

I think this is what will set us apart from the Aints for the division winner. Their defense is a shell of what it was last year, ours is looking way better recently. Another big test this week against the Bucs and then the Steelers shortly after but I'm pretty damn happy with how our defense looks. All NFCS offenses are very close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, PntherPryd said:

Not to be a debbie downer but a not so fun fact is that even with the issues at QB they still lead the league in passing.  Both total yards and ypg.

Really amazing to pull that off with two qb changes (so far) in the books.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/passing

 

Yeah but it's because their rushing attack is terrible. They definitely have a bunch of weapons collected over the years but make no mistake this is a team that struggled with the Browns and a defenseless Falcons. We have all the tools on both sides to beat them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PntherPryd Rookie

PntherPryd

Posted
Posted
Just now, Snake said:

Yeah but it's because their rushing attack is terrible. They definitely have a bunch of weapons collected over the years but make no mistake this is a team that struggled with the Browns and a defenseless Falcons. We have all the tools on both sides to beat them. 

agreed.  That plus with their secondary getting trashed they are in constant comeback mode.  If you look at the stat line only the yardage and ypg were impressive.

Mike Adams was on GMFB this morning and had a great interview.  Was asked twice about Donte, could be a real coming out game for him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mc52beast Grand Master

mc52beast

Posted
Posted

Their secondary is hot garbage, no reason why Cam can’t get 300 yards . Moore and Samuel should have huge games, CMC also.

But don’t forget how we struggle with covering TE’s and Bucs have a pretty good one. Fitz will throw it 40-50 times and ask his playmakers to make him look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...