Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess what grade PFF gave Cam this week?


TN05

Recommended Posts

I’ve seen 2 touchdowns 2 ints and less than 200 yards passing be 85 PFF and in the 80s QBR before(Wilson) 

Numbers don’t lie but people lie about numbers constantly— how they gear the equation for their metric, what they draw from for their stat etc.

We won the game convincingly, and Cam convincingly walked drive after drive into scoring range, and punched touchdowns and position for fieldgoals with ease,..

put that in your metric and smoke it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It baffles me why anyone pays any attention PFF grades. Great source for stat aggreggation, pathetic for grades.

 

Like I said, it’s who and how that team uses what they determine in their metrics and to the weighting etc.

what if the receiver runs the wrong route and the quarterback throws where the receiver was supposed to be, and it’s an interception.

quarterback gets laid out, but the team knows what happened.

do they choose passes that were “on target” by a “batters box” around the receiver? 

What if the play was a complete cluster but worked out like many are? 

Who decides on that box and did they choose it the same way for each quarterback? 

What weighting do they give a pass that’s on target but dropped, versus a pass that’s terrible but caught anyway?

stuff like that— the team knows— and if the team released metrics they designed to measure their own players against film and plays they know to be true maybe it could work.

everyone else just watches with the ignorant eye and throws pie or flamethrowers without knowing what really happened or was supposed to happen.

in short— metrics are flawed by biased people—

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I probably would have become a casual Hornets fan if Cooper ended up there, but the NBA just solidified my apathy for its product. Hornets also got shafted when Lakers got cold feet on the Mark Williams trade. NBA is corrupt and that alien-headed Silver is the kingpin.
    • Most analysts from what I've seen are projecting next year's cap as closer to $298M but as high as in the low 300s. We saw a $24M increase this season, $31M increase last season, and $16M prior to that. There's also the inevitable cap casualties... A'Shawn Robinson being cut saves the team $8.5M. Damien Lewis would save $9M. BB3, Jewell, PJ2 all would save $5M each. Tremble and Mike Jackson could save $4M each. It wouldn't surprise me to see the team make a few moves that end up giving them closer to $50M in cap space to start 2026. I'm less worried about next year's cap space due to the upcoming UFAs for the team: TMo, AT, Tuttle, Wonnum, Nijman, Mays, Corbett, BC, Dowdle, Rozeboom, Martin, Rhattigan, Jansen, Scott... the only FAs I'm seeing on Spotrac outside of TMo that are must keeps are ERFAs Coker + Demani (so long as TMo's knee is fine, of course). 2027 on the other hand is going to be the offseason for Bryce's bonus option with Icky being the most significant UFA. PJ2, A'Shawn, Josey, MJackson, Tremble, Dalton, DJ Johnson, Zavala, and Bartholomew are the only other current FAs then. I'm of the opinion that they are all in on next season and if it doesn't go well, it's being blown up and starting from scratch. They're currently estimated to have $130M in free cap space in 2027.
    • Cardinals at saints week 1 makes me think our week 2 will be Saints at Panthers 
×
×
  • Create New...