Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess what grade PFF gave Cam this week?

TN05

By TN05,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted

I’ve seen 2 touchdowns 2 ints and less than 200 yards passing be 85 PFF and in the 80s QBR before(Wilson) 

Numbers don’t lie but people lie about numbers constantly— how they gear the equation for their metric, what they draw from for their stat etc.

We won the game convincingly, and Cam convincingly walked drive after drive into scoring range, and punched touchdowns and position for fieldgoals with ease,..

put that in your metric and smoke it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It baffles me why anyone pays any attention PFF grades. Great source for stat aggreggation, pathetic for grades.

 

Like I said, it’s who and how that team uses what they determine in their metrics and to the weighting etc.

what if the receiver runs the wrong route and the quarterback throws where the receiver was supposed to be, and it’s an interception.

quarterback gets laid out, but the team knows what happened.

do they choose passes that were “on target” by a “batters box” around the receiver? 

What if the play was a complete cluster but worked out like many are? 

Who decides on that box and did they choose it the same way for each quarterback? 

What weighting do they give a pass that’s on target but dropped, versus a pass that’s terrible but caught anyway?

stuff like that— the team knows— and if the team released metrics they designed to measure their own players against film and plays they know to be true maybe it could work.

everyone else just watches with the ignorant eye and throws pie or flamethrowers without knowing what really happened or was supposed to happen.

in short— metrics are flawed by biased people—

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why I Believe That We Will Trade Down

      By Martin · Posted

      I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...