Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the observer sports section is doomed....


Zod

Recommended Posts

Have you noticed? The opinions and commentary of the so called experts of the observer are no more interesting or insightful than any number of posters on this site. The only difference being they have direct access to the players for quotes. But with the players having a direct line to the public now via facebook, twitter, etc... how much longer will sports hacks be needed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all the writers are shared between Charlotte and Raleigh papers...nothing new or original anymore. I was talking with a former columnist last night who told me the Atlanta paper is now much smaller and thinner than the Observer, in a city more than twice the size. Newspapers are a thing of the past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ob sucks! You would think since they can walk over to the stadium, practice fields, offices, etc., they would actually have a leg up on anyone with 411. I learn more about the Panthers off the radio, the guys on Espn on the insider, and the Fox Sports version of It.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i remember cutting out articles for my panthers scrap book

there were three or four panthers articles a day from about six different newspapers in the beginning. I still have the original ten page observer layout for when they went to lambeau for the nfc championship game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While printed newspapers will eventually lose circulation and put their money into online versions, I laugh at people mocking them. We live in a day and age now where anyone can put their thoughts and opinions on the Internet. Hell, Wikipedia can be edited by anyone and some people swear by it! Just look at half the garbage that rolls into this forum from some of the most unknown sources and webpages around. At least the journalists you love to trash (who DO make errors...I'm not denying that at all) work under a "code of ethics". ESPN Insiders, gossip hounds like John Clayton, etc. work under a code of rumor and "he said she said" (and we love it!!!). The Internet is slowly ruining truth and accuracy in the world today. Just look at Twitter for crying out loud. People are starting to take Tweets as fact, when IN FACT it can come from any joe schmoe sitting their on his couch eating cheetos. I think training camp was a fine example. TWEET: "OMG!!!111 Smith is limping" = 55 threads on him being out three games. :lol:

It's sad really. As much as I like technology and the places it can take us, it's turned us all into a bunch of helpless fools dependent on the next iPhone App in order to survive. Dangerous, dangerous stuff. No wonder kids are so fat today. I used to ride my bike and play outside when I was younger, but kids today are all about the PS3 and Facebook. I know it's ironic me griping about this ON the Internet...but really...you think anyone out there actually outshines newspaper journalists?

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go check profootballtalk's Rumor Mill. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought their paper everyday to get Panther info until one season a few years back. My friend came down from Jersey, had tickets he bought that came with parking in the Ob lot. So I paid to park in their lot beside him. We started tailgating and grilling, having a good time, then security came up and told us we could not grill in the Ob lot. I was like why? They couldn't give me an answer but called the police on me cause I would not put out the grill. I ended up having to put it out and not being able to finish cooking. So that monday I called the Ob to give them hell, and find out why we couldn't grill in an outside lot. The reason was, they had no insurance on their lot at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While printed newspapers will eventually lose circulation and put their money into online versions, I laugh at people mocking them. We live in a day and age now where anyone can put their thoughts and opinions on the Internet. Hell, Wikipedia can be edited by anyone and some people swear by it! Just look at half the garbage that rolls into this forum from some of the most unknown sources and webpages around. At least the journalists you love to trash (who DO make errors...I'm not denying that at all) work under a "code of ethics". ESPN Insiders, gossip hounds like John Clayton, etc. work under a code of rumor and "he said she said" (and we love it!!!). The Internet is slowly ruining truth and accuracy in the world today. Just look at Twitter for crying out loud. People are starting to take Tweets as fact, when IN FACT it can come from any joe schmoe sitting their on his couch eating cheetos. I think training camp was a fine example. TWEET: "OMG!!!111 Smith is limping" = 55 threads on him being out three games. :lol:

It's sad really. As much as I like technology and the places it can take us, it's turned us all into a bunch of helpless fools dependent on the next iPhone App in order to survive. Dangerous, dangerous stuff. No wonder kids are so fat today. I used to ride my bike and play outside when I was younger, but kids today are all about the PS3 and Facebook. I know it's ironic me griping about this ON the Internet...but really...you think anyone out there actually outshines newspaper journalists?

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go check profootballtalk's Rumor Mill. :wink:

You've got to be kidding me.

All the flaws in you mentioned in online distribution are because of random no name sites and people who are stupid. There are plenty of credible sources for every topic out there online. While there may be stereotypical "let me get online and voice my stupid uneducated opinion" people out there, there are also plenty of great sources.

It's all about how smart the user is and how he finds his information online. If you aren't smart enough to find credible sources instead using Twitter, then that's your fault.

Paper companies are a dying media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tetairoa McMillan.   The last 28 1st overall picks were either a QB, DE, or OT. Seeing as I don't think we'd take an OT in the 1st and give up on Ickey as an LT yet and there doesn't seem to be a clear overall #1 type of QB or DE pick this year, it very well could be a non conventional #1 overall this year, at least in regards from the last almost 3 decades of drafts. If we didn't have Horn, I'd be more open to Hunter as a CB at #1, but we have him so another CB wouldn't be how I'd use a #1 pick.  And as much as I love Legette, if we have SB contending aspirations, I don't think Legette is a #1 on a team like that, but he damn sure is an elite #2 on a team like that.  He's more of the Smith/Higgins/Waddle to Brown/Chase/Hill (in terms of role/impact, not style of play of course). T-Mac is going to be the top ranked WR on every team's board in the end.  He is going to be a true outside #1 WR who is viewed as a consensus Top 5 WR in the game by his second contract in the same way guys like Jefferson and Chase have done.  His height combined with his speed, athleticism, and hands are near impossible to find all in one player, there is a reason his generally used comp is Mike Evans (although as he's not as thick, I personally see him more as an AJ Green). Yes, as an Arizona alum I've admitted to having bias towards the player to begin with.  But he's also someone very widely being put into the Top 5 in mock drafts lately and most of them have him as the first non QB offensive player being taken, so it's not really THAT much of a homer pick on my part anyways. If a QB or DE truly separate themselves as being a can't miss prospect come draft day, I'm open to that discussion, but until then, or if it doesn't happen, T-Mac is my pick 100 times out of 100.
    • Logjam, indeed! Makes me nervous.
×
×
  • Create New...