Hurney willing to trade CJ?

[PantherPhann89]

Maybe,  I missed it but I did not see where Hurney said that CJ Anderson was a potential trade. He was listed as a trade option be ESPN David Newton. Whether we do or not, I clicked the title bc it said Hurney willing to trade CJ Anderson...

[iamhubby1]

2 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

It just amazes me how short sighted this fan base is. 

 

    Um, you too, are a member of this fan base. lol

[Wolfcop]

CJ is the real-life handcuff to CMC. If #22 goes down, we have a proven vet RB who can get some yards.

[XOBlackxJokerOX]

 

You could pretty easily talk me into trading Butler for a mid-late rounder and moving Kendrick Norton up from the practice squad.

I knew I was forgetting somebody. 

[Camp Fodder]

9 hours ago, thefuzz said:

No reason to trade him.  We are pushing for a playoff spot.   Anybody remember who Cam was throwing to in the playoffs last year?

Yea wasn’t kaelin clay our number 2 receiver?

[Toomers]

11 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

Yea wasn’t kaelin clay our number 2 receiver?

And Bersin being tackled by the 40yd line. Here’s a replay....

[IceWhiteice]

Should he should be worth something. He probably will moved

[JARROD]

All I can say is,..

Remember 2005,...

Foster went down,.. Stephen Davis was stuck on Injured reserve because no one designated him to come back— and it was Nick Goins time,..

so hell to the no 

[trueblade]

5 minutes ago, JARROD said:

All I can say is,..

Remember 2005,...

Foster went down,.. Stephen Davis was stuck on Injured reserve because no one designated him to come back— and it was Nick Goins time,..

so hell to the no 

It would have been really hard to designate him to return considering that option didn't exist until 2012.

[JARROD]

21 minutes ago, trueblade said:

It would have been really hard to designate him to return considering that option didn't exist until 2012.

So does that mean you agree that getting rid of CJ and having no credible running back to take us into the playoffs like the 2005 Panthers is a repeat of the past?

And the correction would be that Stephen Davis did not have to be put on injured reserve at all, as it was widely talked about him being healthy enough to play in the playoffs in 2005.

So there,.. now go eat some more toilet paper.

[pantherclaw]

3 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Um, you too, are a member of this fan base. lol

And your point is? Nothing to do with anything. 

[pantherclaw]

1 hour ago, JARROD said:

All I can say is,..

Remember 2005,...

Foster went down,.. Stephen Davis was stuck on Injured reserve because no one designated him to come back— and it was Nick Goins time,..

so hell to the no 

Exactly. 

Except there was no designation to return back then. 

Can never have enough good running backs. 

We need CJ. 

[Turnip]

 

CAP before CJ.

CJ has proven way more than CAP has and we'll need his experience if something happens to CMC.

I'm not sure who all might be looking for a RB right now, but Philly, NYJ, and maybe BUF come to mind. CAP would only be worth a conditional 5-7th rounder.

Also, I like how I can refer to all our RBs with 3 letters or less.

This CJ has been a 1,000 yard back as recent as last year I believe.

[JARROD]

16 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Exactly. 

Except there was no designation to return back then. 

Can never have enough good running backs. 

We need CJ. 

Yeh— the controversy was that Davis could have played against the Seahawks and may have been the difference so everyone didn’t gang of 5 Steve Smith everywhere he went,..

but he was inactive for the game, and the word was he could have dressed.

it really doesn’t matter the specifics

the point was if we get rid of CJ, and CMac goes down,..

then what?