Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Realistic DE trade targets


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

 

I'm wondering if u would get on ur hands and knees to blow Hardy since ur the only one that talks about him. Your obsession for a guy that only got sacks against Atlanta for a couple games in his career is ridiculous. 

He’s the Panther single season sack record holder and that team had more than any the entire league had in three decades.  Total coincidence though.  Meanwhile in reality he was named #53 on the top 100 while JJ Jansen joined the chorus of teammates singing the praises and saying it would CONTINUE to come.  http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-videos/0ap2000000356146/Top-100-Greg-Hardy

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Nails' Hardy drum has transitioned from being sad over the past two years to down right comical to me now. Way to play the long game dude. 

Except it’s not.  Wes Horton was a joke then, he’s a colossal joke now.  We traded up for a guy in the 3rd round that not only couldn’t get a sack, he couldn’t even get a uniform.  We’re counting on a project at arguably the second most important position on the field that didn’t even play high school or college football.  What a joke!!!

Meanwhile Hardy has done EVERYTHING to get another chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nails said:

Hardy har har (pun intended).  This DE corps is no laughing matter.

You should be laughing. Hardy is nothing but a punch(mma reference intended)line. His MMA career will be done as fast as his NFL career as soon as he actually has a real opponent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...