Curtis Samuel

[Yaboychris28]

Get this man on the field. Period. That’s all I got. 

[Mr. Scot]

Not that the play went bad or anything, but if you're going to run an end around why run it with Jarius Wright instead of Curtis Samuel?

[Seltzer]

Second. Game breaker

[juliosantos]

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not that the play went bad or anything, but if you're going to run an end around why run it with Jarius Wright instead of Curtis Samuel?

Contrarian 

[TN05]

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not that the play went bad or anything, but if you're going to run an end around why run it with Jarius Wright instead of Curtis Samuel?

Because everyone expects it to go to Moore or Samuel, but not Wright? IDK.

[CRA]

boggles the mind.   

the fact Norv seems to manage just a handful of plays for him and Moore is crazy.   Samuel has looked fantastic.  I don't care what "leadership" Smith brings, he shouldn't dominate playing time over guys like this.  

Samuel and Moore should both be getting 5 touches per game.  That should be the goal each week.  Not snaps. 

[JARROD]

12 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not that the play went bad or anything, but if you're going to run an end around why run it with Jarius Wright instead of Curtis Samuel?

They didn’t see that coming,.. ha.

[MikeD83]

He could be our Tyreek Hill. Something good seems to happen every time he gets the ball. Im excited to see how he and Moore continue to develop.

[BrianS]

Samuel should definitely get more time than Smith.  I mean, has Samuel dropped balls and we need that veteran stability?  No.  Has he made key mistakes that cost us?  No.  Let Smith lead from the sideline, become a mentor, great!  I'm all for that.  But Samuel can friggin' change the game.  He runs decent routes, he separates and once he has the ball, he is terrifying in the open field.

[trucpfan]

2 hours ago, CRA said:

boggles the mind.   

the fact Norv seems to manage just a handful of plays for him and Moore is crazy.   Samuel has looked fantastic.  I don't care what "leadership" Smith brings, he shouldn't dominate playing time over guys like this.  

Samuel and Moore should both be getting 5 touches per game.  That should be the goal each week.  Not snaps. 

Very true that would mean about 3-4 more sweeps 2-3 more smoke screens and probably a RPO to Curtis like yesterday not ideal starting situations but I'm ok with that on this subject and I'm ok if it's hand offs and such bc I just want the ball in his hands by any means necessary bc we aren't reducing Smiths snaps to much especially after Sunday. I'm thinking based off normal games 12 drives a game we need to get him 4 touches a half he's looks explosive as ever. Really since preseason we all know but know it's on tape vs his peers when he gets the ball it's almost Tyrek Hill lite more like Percy Harvin a big play every touch. We do have two guys who have to get touches but it'll get overshadowed by Torrey and Funch even tho Funch dropped I'd say 2 maybe 3 catchable balls. Even though he made some catches after the drops he should loose a few snaps based off dropping catchable passes.

edit: I started this thread a hour before posting at least a hour probably two tbh phone died when I got back up and going I literally forgot to come back and post it so I didn't even see that other Tyrek comment prior to.

[FugAllY'all]

I mean, you have to think that DJ Moore's fumbles justified the coaches thought process about not putting too much into inexperienced hands. Remember Samuel had an interception doink off his hands too on what should have been a routine catch last year.  I think our games have been too close and combined with how few drives we get (total of 7!!!! in the second half of our last two games), you go with the guys you trust not to drop the ball, figuratively and literally. Ideally we up their number of snaps until they are on the field for most first and second downs, while still bring in Wright and Smith for the critical downs. 

[CRA]

21 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

Very true that would mean about 3-4 more sweeps 2-3 more smoke screens and probably a RPO to Curtis like yesterday not ideal starting situations but I'm ok with that on this subject and I'm ok if it's hand offs and such bc I just want the ball in his hands by any means necessary bc we aren't reducing Smiths snaps to much especially after Sunday. I'm thinking based off normal games 12 drives a game we need to get him 4 touches a half he's looks explosive as ever. Really since preseason we all know but know it's on tape vs his peers when he gets the ball it's almost Tyrek Hill lite more like Percy Harvin a big play every touch. We do have two guys who have to get touches but it'll get overshadowed by Torrey and Funch even tho Funch dropped I'd say 2 maybe 3 catchable balls. Even though he made some catches after the drops he should loose a few snaps based off dropping catchable passes.

edit: I started this thread a hour before posting at least a hour probably two tbh phone died when I got back up and going I literally forgot to come back and post it so I didn't even see that other Tyrek comment prior to.

Not exclusively just backfield stuff.  They need legit routes at WR we more consistently work in too. 

almost midway through the season and haven’t yet tried to have Moore go deep on a vertical.  Dude got the juice.   Just simple slants can be huge plays for Samuel and Moore because they aren’t as likely to go down at the catch like Fun

I think the solution is more slow no huddle running 3 WR sets.   Too many downs spent running in unproductive 2 WR sets early in games 

[Ricky Spanish]

Fun fact:

We've won 100% of the games in which Samuel has caught a pass this year.

[Millioso7]

Watch his highlights from last year if you wanna get hype!