Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Ravens are 1 of 5 teams in the league Cam hasn't beaten


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Barring a Super Bowl appearance and victory against one of those teams he’s yet to beat, he’ll have to wait until...

2020 for the Broncos (in Charlotte) and Chiefs (in Kansas City)

And if y’all don’t beat them this year...

2022 for the Ravens (in Baltimore) and Steelers (in Charlotte)

No telling how long until he can check the Panthers off that list. :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KC is a regular season team if I've seen one.

All offense and no defense. 

I'd be wildly surprised if they're playing in February. We've seen Mahomes struggle against good defendes already.

Also we'd have beaten the chifes once if Lafell could catch a fuging cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PantherJD said:

All the more impressive considering that Brees did a lot of his work against the AFC in San Diego, but Cam's tenure has been shorter and he only sees each AFC team every 4 years.

I completely agree. I don't want to look this up, but it sure seems like we have a pretty good record vs. the AFC with Cam as QB. If you're not familiar with how Cam plays QB because you play him but once every 4 years, you have to have a very good defense to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Randolph Panther said:

Just noticed that we opened up as a home dog to Baltimore.  -1.5 Seems kind of surprising but I havent really followed them

After being Thanksgiving Day underdogs to the 3-7 Cowboys when we were 10-0, I stopped caring about Vegas lines at least with regards to the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JARROD said:

The Chiefs are not going to the Super bowl== every time they have been anointed, they fall apart.

As far as the Ravens,...lets enjoy beating the Eagles until Wednesday ha.

on 5 teams,.. well there will be 4 after next week.

Ravens arguably have one of the current best defenses in the league atm paired with a decent offense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Rags said:

KC is a regular season team if I've seen one.

All offense and no defense. 

I'd be wildly surprised if they're playing in February. We've seen Mahomes struggle against good defendes already.

Also we'd have beaten the chifes once if Lafell could catch a fuging cold.

Or if KB could hold onto the ball and not have it taken away by the DB (Peters? Berry?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...