Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll: Players vs Coaching


Eazy-E

Who is more to blame for our struggles this season?  

87 members have voted

  1. 1. Are the players or the coaches a bigger issue in the Panthers struggles this season?

    • Players
      23
    • Coaches
      63


Recommended Posts

No it’s both or 50/50 bullshit. I just want to see where the majority of our fans stand with the current state of the Panthers and our struggles this season.

I personally feel coaching has been a much bigger issue across the board. Talent wise I would argue we are stronger at almost every position compared to last year. (Norwell and Williams being the major exceptions)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m at like 65% coaching and 35% players so I don’t really know how to vote.

I think our DL has been absolute ass so that’s on the players but I think Washington could and should blitz more.

I think our offensive play calling and particularly the personnel decisions could be much better but the execution there has also been lacking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

    First, I don't appreciate you asking for my opinion. Then telling me there are limitations. Not cool dude.

 

    Second. And I don't want to take no poo for this but...I think it is a bit of both. With a sprinkle of WTH thrown in. 

 

    We were 3-1, then a WTH game happens. A perfect "Peanut Punch", Cam under throws Funch, Smith's fumble/completed pass, and Moore trying to do too much. That is 4 WTHs that went against us. Who knows what happens if we get 2 of those. But alas, no such luck.

 

    Some Coaching moves, player mistakes, and lady luck kinda peeing in our Corn Flakes have lead us to this point. 

 

    Short story long; 35% Coaching. 55% Players. 10% Lady Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

how can you give a poll with two options then tell us its a third option?

I think I made it pretty clear. Like someone posted before, if you think it is 65% coaching and 35% players, than your answer would be coaching as 65 > 35. It is pretty simple.

There is no right or wrong answer. Just trying to gauge where the majority stands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are all professionals--it is the players' jobs to be ready, and it is the coaches' jobs to get them ready and manage the game. 

The coach must ultimately assume the responsibility, even if we spot the opposition 10 points off 2  unforeseeable turnovers and lose by 6.

The presser disappointed me because RR started making excuses--turnover at coordinators, weather (need a dome for practice), bad luck, etc.  Even if all are true, you don't do that.  Take the blame and move on--you are getting it anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer might not fit your narrative.

You also forgot to offer up that the opposing team is doing everything it can to win the game as well.

We were in both losses until the very last moments of those games. The same could be said for the wins, as well. 

The team isn't working flawlessly and there have been coaching issues and player issues. There have also been moments where luck just hasn't gone our way. And then there have been moments where the opposing teams are just playing lights out.

It happens in real life. 

Good teams bear down, work harder and don't give up. Good fans keep cheering. This season is far from over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...