Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We are the worst 3-1 team in the NFL

Eazy-E

By Eazy-E,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Eazy-E said:

and I fuging love it.

Bring on the hate ESPN, Fox, CBS, and all you other bitch ass sports news outlets. You all can suck our collective unit.

3-1 motherfugers KEEP POUNDING!

Motherforkers get it right ha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tepper's Chest Hair Contributor

Tepper's Chest Hair

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I have a hard time putting us anywhere close to the level of the Rams, Bears or Vikings.  Definitely don't see us being on the Chiefs level but they're not in the NFC.

Saints offense vs our defense scares me too.  

Bears aren't impressing me yet.  Lost to a meh Green Bay team.  Barely escaped a below .500 Seahawks and horrible Cards.  While their defense is playing better than ours, their offense is a huge liability.

Chiefs offense has weapons, but their defense has looked horrible over all.  Same with Saints.  I expect the Chiefs to cool off soon though.  While we may match up badly with the Saints offense, I believe they will match up badly with ours as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

Bears aren't impressing me yet.  Lost to a meh Green Bay team.  Barely escaped a below .500 Seahawks and horrible Cards.  While their defense is playing better than ours, their offense is a huge liability.

Chiefs offense has weapons, but their defense has looked horrible over all.  Same with Saints.  I expect the Chiefs to cool off soon though.  While we may match up badly with the Saints offense, I believe they will match up badly with ours as well.

Bears defense worries me. And much as I hate to say it, our own defense worries me too. Giving up 30 points to the Giants isn't encouraging with the Saints on the horizon twice.

Chiefs? You know, it's not like we've never seen an Andy Reid team start off hot and then tank before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
caatfan Newbie

caatfan

Posted
Posted

The teams predicted for bottom dwelling (Jets, Bills, Browns, Cards) all won today. The Rams squeaked out with the same 33-31 escape we had, even though theirs was a comeback win. The point is that there don't seem to be any easy teams this time around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...