Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We are the worst 3-1 team in the NFL

Eazy-E

By Eazy-E,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Right on! 

(Did not know what to say--they don't give out rings after 4 games).  Davis, Olsen coming back--Players like Gaulden, Moore, Samuel, Moton, and yes--Thomas are getting better each week.  It is when  you peak--and that will be in early 2019..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tepper's Chest Hair Contributor

Tepper's Chest Hair

Posted
Posted

For comparison.  Other teams that have 1 loss or better:

Bengals 4-1 (wonder who they lost to)

Chiefs 5-0  (Chargers, Steelers, 49ers, Broncos, Jaguars)

Redskins 2-1 (beat 0-4 Cards, 2-2 Packers, yet to play this week yet)

Bears 3-1 (beat 2-2 Seachickens, 0-4 Cards, 2-2 Bucs)

Saints 3-1 (Beat Browns, Falcons, Giants, lost to Bucs)

Rams 4-0 (Beat Raiders, Cards, Chargers, Vikings)

 

If I had to rate where we fell in this, I wouldn't put us at the worst.  But In the middle.  We probably have the best quality win out of the 3-1 teams. It does make the Falcons loss sting that much more, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eazy-E Mentor

Eazy-E

Posted
  • Author
Posted

After seeing stuff on twitter from the some of the big talking heads I am sure we are going to get roasted tomorrow on how us winning was a fluke and all that bull poo. A win is a win in the NFL I don't give a fug what they have to say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...