Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen owns Cowherd on Cam


PntherPryd

Recommended Posts

That’s my TE

I still don’t think he went in hard enough though. He should have said that the check downs and easy throws are there this year. He doesn’t have to consistently make an incredible 3rd and long throw anymore. That effects his stats too on top of guys dropping the ball. It doesn’t mean he’s miraculously better than he was last year. It’s just a reflection of the system. Cams been the real deal for a long time. Fug Colin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh.. Cowherd has said much worse things than in this video.  It didn’t even seem like he 100% dissed Cam, he even said “has this just always been Cam, and he just finally got the coordinator?”. Or something like that. 

Good on Olsen for responding in a way that doesn’t disrespect Cam or Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, zacka77ack said:

Colin Cowherd is reality TV guys. The sooner you stop viewing, clicking, retweeting - the sooner he goes away. Stop consuming and he'll stop being an idiot.

Yep.

Skip Bayless is in the same boat. These guys don’t even believe the sh!t they’re saying half the time but it stirs the pot and people react. People react, they get views/clicks and they get paid. 

Can’t get mad at these guys for making a very good living off of the stupidity of others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Johnny Rockets said:

Maybe I was expecting something more since it was Cowherd but that just sounded like a level headed football discussion on both their parts. 

I copied it from a tweet on my feed, do not actually listen to him but I heard Olsen's comment about "good to hear you say nice things about Cam" as the underhanded compliment  aimed at Cowherds well known constant criticism of Cam.

The fact that Greg came off so smooth and confident is another example of what a great improvement he will be over Witten

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...