Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else bothered by this NFL Gameday Morning Commercial?


fitty76

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Why did the NFL have to throw dad under the bus... his “mom” could easily tell him to shut up

Well we've already got the ad with Raider mom basically shutting down the kid's lemonade stand they clearly worked hard to set up and run on a nice afternoon.  Only to force their asses inside to sit on the couch and watch the Raiders get rekt.  That's damn near child abuse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can laugh at it all the way to the end but the end hits a reflection of me telling my own kid to shush before they can get whatever they are trying to say out. As it goes they should not have had the kid say I love u but something meaningless. Thats when the morale factor starts to kick in....They tried too hard right there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have shushed my kid during a game, but only during an actual play.

 

I remember going to a game (Detroit 2008) and he talked incessantly,  He was about 8 at the time and asked me a nonstop stream of questions for about the entire first qtr.  Generally speaking questions are a good thing.  But I could tell the people around me were getting annoyed, so I finally said no questions during the play.  He did slow down a bit.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chaos said:

Well we've already got the ad with Raider mom basically shutting down the kid's lemonade stand they clearly worked hard to set up and run on a nice afternoon.  Only to force their asses inside to sit on the couch and watch the Raiders get rekt.  That's damn near child abuse. 

I could argue letting your children be Raider fans is child abuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a football fan and my dad wasn't. If that scene played out in my childhood, I was probably the one saying "shh".

As to the commercial, it's a bit of dark humor, and yeah probably in poor taste. I can chuckle at it from my perspective, but it's fair to ask how does a kid who's actually real life sad because he doesn't get attention from his parents feel when he sees this?

The NFL has been making a lot of effort to be image conscious given the number of people that are taking shots at them. Might not be the wisest thing in the world to give those people ammo.

I get that it sounds ridiculous, but unfortunately that's the world we live in today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow sandy vaginas 

have some sense of humor for god’s sake. I am only 32 but am seeing the world change like generations before me but in a pussified way and it makes me sad.

soon it’ll be a felony/child abuse to laugh at commercials like this 

findit funny or don’t find it funny or even distasteful and it’s all good to me. But to be legitimately offended? Holy poo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...