Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Reid Press Conference


Saca312

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Mage said:

Probably because minorities on average can't afford it as easily as white people on average.  It doesn't mean black people are born with the mentality to not care about education.  

And again, values instilled in a family are still tied to the system.   I forgot who did the study (Dan Gilbert maybe?  Or someone in his book), but lower-income families are more likely to promote and value outward qualities (such as following authority and such) whereas a higher-income family is more likely to promote inward qualities (for example, critical thinking and leadership).  So even if minorities are more likely to not value education, it is still tied to the system.  LIS, it isn't like minorities are born and immediately just happen to value education less than white people do.  There is a reason for it.

This is what people overlook when it comes to systematic oppression.  You can't just look at one case and judge based off that.  It is a LONG trickle-down process.  

I would argue minorities have many more incentives to further their education than the average white male.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarHeel said:

I would argue minorities have many more incentives to further their education than the average white male.

You could argue that, and I wouldn’t disagree, but having more incentives doesn’t suddenly make it easier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mage said:

You could argue that, and I wouldn’t disagree, but having more incentives doesn’t suddenly make it easier. 

Furthering your education is never an easy thing, for anyone. And it’s why many choose not to do it. It takes considerable effort and it’s not a knock on anyone who doesn’t go that route. 

 

Fiscally, it makes more sense in this day to go the trade route or learn your craft fresh out of high school. No significant debt, jobs readily available and you are earning for a minimum of 4 years while others are acruing debt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mage said:

I don't think you understand the concept of systematic oppression.  
 

Nobody is saying black people are automatically absolved from poor decisions they may or may not make (hence why Reid and Kaepernick are so focused on programs for inner-city students, which are predominately minorties).  But unless you think there is something in their DNA that makes them more prone to, for example, graduate at a far lower rate than white people, then I'm not sure how you don't realize it is tied to the system.

It's a cycle.  Minorities such as black people are more likely to grow up in a poor neighborhood, thus they are more likely to go to a poor school, thus are more likely to fall in bad traps.  It's a system that is hard to escape because the system doesn't give people that many outlets.  Not everyone grows up with a fair opportunity to escape.

One thing that would help is more funding for inner-city schools, but nope.  Go to a nice suburban school in Raleigh (like I went to) or a good college campus in Charlotte (like UNCC where I attend), and then go to a school like St. Aug or a high school/elementary school in the middle of nowhere and tell me the kids at those schools have the same chances.  You'd be a fool to think they do.

Id be a fool if i believed that you are systematically oppressed with the amount of opportunity that is presented in America. It doesn't matter if your parents are poor, if you go to a shitty school, or if people around you are convicts.

Do good in school and don't get involved with idiots, and the world is yours. That's not a lot of rules in life to follow to be successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Definitely Not Trolling said:

Id be a fool if i believed that you are systematically oppressed with the amount of opportunity that is presented in America. It doesn't matter if your parents are poor, if you go to a shitty school, or if people around you are convicts.

Do good in school and don't get involved with idiots, and the world is yours. That's not a lot of rules in life to follow to be successful.

I’m sure you make 100k+ easy then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I appreciate you not generalizing me as many have done.

 

Obsviously, as ive already stated in a previous post, the gap is “race-related.” Women and minorities alike share the challenge of salary equality in many (but not all) settings.

 

However, my argument this entire post has been that there is equal opportunity for all to excel and prosper  in life and where salary is a concern for some, a crippling amount of debt post graduation might be something that some might not have to deal with due to opportunity that is given to them because of the color of their skin. 

 

I don’t want to equate one hardship for another, just simply stating that certain systems in our work force and education system are questionable. And that is not solely a minority thing.

 

As I have had others tell me, I can’t speak for them. Just like others can’t speak for me: a white guy who graduated a HBCU with nearly 200k in debt while others in his class had the opportunity to start life fresh out of grad school with no grad school loans and stipends to pay their way through. Those opportunities were nor afforded to me, even though my application to the university read “Caucasian and other-Native American.”

You make good points but you tried to dismiss black people's hardships by bringing up the hardships of people in other countries, and your last paragraph sounds bitter because people who went to school with you graduated with less debt than you. You know there's a reason for minority scholarships, right? There's an entire historical context as to why HBCUs exists and why minority scholarships exists and your being around black people doesn't make you an arbiter of what black people are allowed to protest for. 

Again, i don't think you're racist, but maybe narcissistic applies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

You make good points but you tried to dismiss black people's hardships by bringing up the hardships of people in other countries, and your last paragraph sounds bitter because people who went to school with you graduated with less debt than you. You know there's a reason for minority scholarships, right? There's an entire historical context as to why HBCUs exists and why minority scholarships exists and your being around black people doesn't make you an arbiter of what black people are allowed to protest for. 

Again, i don't think you're racist, but maybe narcissistic applies

Was never an intention on being dismissive. It was to create awareness that Americans in general have significant affordabilities that aren’t offered elsewhere. It’s what makes this country so great. Too often we hear opinions from those who have not had to endure those kinds of tyranny. I have the privilege of hearing those things first hand form a great man. Wish he had a larger platform for his voice because it would create a greater level of appreciation for what all of us, regardless of race, have in this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've explained this in more detail before. Briefly, there's a process to quickly evaluate a QB. Also, there's a type of QB that excels at a higher rate than others at the pro level. After that, it's about keeping the QBs flowing through the system. 1st round QBs are not superior, they just get more reps and game time. You can find just as many competitive QBs that are 3rd day or undrafted if you give them the same reps and game time. Now, to dive deeper for fun. To understand this further, there are rare 1st round QB exceptions, but they must come with a pro pedigree and proven success in college. There's only 1 to 3 of these QBs every decade (John Elway 1983, Peyton Manning 1998, Eli Manning 2004, Andrew Luck 2012, Jared Goff 2016, Patrick Mahomes 2017, and Joe Burrow 2020. That's 1 of every 20 1st round QBs (5% of historical 1st round QBs in modern draft era). When you look at 1st rd QB success, eliminate these rare ones from your samples because they are trained to be championship QBs. 100% of them have taken their team to a championship. Also, the Bill Walsh tree knows the formula for building an offense and finding a QB QUICKLY. The question is why haven't others figured it out & continue to waste draft capital on QBs? Based on my QB evaluation system, here's the QBs I had slotted for the Panthers over the past 10 drafts. Patrick Mahomes, Brad Kaaya, Cooper Rush, Lamar Jackson, Brett Rypien, Tyler Huntley, Jalen Hurts, Shane Buechele, Desmond Ridder, Brock Purdy, Aqeel Glass, Jack Coan, Aidan O'Connell, Tanner McKee, Spencer Rattler, Devin Leary, Sam Hartman, Quinn Ewers. The ones in bold were the ones that rated the highest for pro championship qualities (probable franchise QBs). Obviously,  we didn't need them all, but it's about flow of pro championship qualities shown in college and not the most physically gifted. Also, there are a few QBs every decade who have the qualities, but never get a chance. If your talent evaluation/QB system is good enough, you can go get 2 to 3 of them tomorrow to show what they can do when their name is called. I expect 1 of every 6 QBs to be worthy of being a franchise QB. There's strict rules to the depth chart qualifications, rotation, minimum KPIs and cuts/trades for me. Panthers have had Collins, Beuerlein, Weinke, Delhomme, Clausen, Newton, Bridgewater, Darnold, and Young. If you include Lewis, Peete, Allen and Mayfield, the Panthers have had 3 of 13 championship level franchise QBs. 1 of 5 (1 of 6 if you don't count Collins). It's the same for every franchise. The difference is a certain coaching tree knows how to move them through quicker than all the others while building defense with the most valuable draft picks. For Walsh, Montana(3rd rd) was his 3rd QB and Young(trade) was his 12th (9 yrs). He had a process allowing him to move through them rapidly. For Holmgren, Favre(trade) was his 4th QB and Hasselbeck(6th rd/trade) was his 15th QB (10 yrs). Neither of them settled on or tried to solve the problems of their 1st QB. For Andy Reid, McNabb(1st rd) was his 2nd QB and Mahomes(1st rd) was his 15th QB (19yrs). For John Harbaugh, Flacco(1st rd) was his 1st and Jackson(1st rd) was his 8th (11 yrs). For Sean McVay, Goff(1st rd) was his 1st and Stafford(trade) was his 5th (5yrs). Reid was the slow and stubborn one who wouldn't move on from his QB & had to wait nearly 2 decades to grab a QB that is the rare exception. I present this to show how 1st round picks are wasted on QBs, and it's the process fitting the QB to the system that generates success. Championship leader qualities and a process to move through QBs for a single coach's offense until you find a winner is the formula. The ages of these QBs from the Walsh tree when they won their first SB: Montana(25), Young(33), Favre(27), Mahomes(24), Flacco(27), and Stafford (33). Mahomes is the only sports pedigree QB exception on this list. QBs selected in the top 20 picks that weren't a pedigree QB were discarded by the team that drafted them. It will continue to be the same for the QB position as the dynamics of an offense from coach to field to team to clutch moments are not going to change. The combines/draft is just a media show that will only highlight the rare pedigree exceptions at QB for the NFL. You can line up ANY 12 QBs demonstrating success in college with the pro championship level qualities right now & you'll find a couple franchise QBs. Overrated arm strength & athleticism mean absolutely nothing for success at the pro level (that's a bonus). If they had enough of the tangibles to consistently succeed in college, it will translate to the pros. Currently, the Panthers are on QB #1 being shoved into Canales' system. Hooker is Canales' 4th QB (5th if you count Bryce Perkins). The Panthers only need to get Young out of the way and start giving these QBs a shot. If a GM can't fit a QB with the offensive coach in 6 QBs, then it's time to move to a new GM. For Canales' system, I'd go with Cooper Rush(trade), Tyler Huntley(available/ps), Desmond Ridder(available), Jack Coan(available), Aqeel Glass(available), Tanner McKee(trade), Sam Hartman(available/ps), Devin Leary(available), Hendon Hooker(on roster), Clayton Tune(available/ps), Chris Oladokun(available/ps), DJ Uiagalelei(available/ps) and Shane Buechele(available/ps). No particular order. This just demonstrates the winning process at QB to build a winning team. 7 of these QBs have been chosen by SB winning coaches. The point is to line them up and have one head coach with one offensive system move through them as quickly as possible until one of them holds on to the starting position with success and claims the franchise QB title. I expect the top 20 1st round picks for a franchise QB is the only way crowd to attack this and the Bill Walsh tree. Likely going to tell you that 6th round & later QBs as well as the Walsh tree are the sole outliers. We can count more 6th round and later championship QBs(13) than we can the 1st round pedigree QBs(7). As for the other 47 SB QBs, only 15 QBs have been drafted in the top 20 and led their first team to the SB. The best return is the pedigree 1st round QB, but this is rare. As for top 20 pick QBs that aren't pedigree, you're better off running 6th round and later QBs through the offensive system as quick as possible while spending that top 20 1st round pick on core defense or the rare dual threat skill position player. I don't expect the typical media driven fan to agree. I know SB winning coaches keep signing my college QB targets.
    • Best QB I've seen this year so far, with all due respect to Allen and Jackson.
    • What’s with the chargers run game?  They were good last year 
×
×
  • Create New...