Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Collusion case against NFL has not been dropped


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mc52beast said:

If anything, this goes to show that hiring Reid was a business decision. The Panthers realized that starting Jones would possibly result in losses and less revenue than they could possibly lose by hiring Reid. Ultimately, no one is going to care if he protests or not so long as the Panthers win. The problem with Reid and Kaep protesting before was that the team wasn't performing as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

There was more to Reid than the alleged collusion/blackballing which could be because of the concussions he had that could be the reason no teams would touch him but Panthers are taking a risk no other team even tried to do and sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...yet. That could change.

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

The only thing I could think of is that his lawyer might argue that Tepper was not an NFL owner at the time Reid filed the suit.

It's weak, but hey...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

Also, everyone seems to forget that Kaep was an asshole right from the beginning. Being an asshole, declining ability, along with extra baggage doesn't make anyone else want to sign a player like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

Doesn’t mean he wasn’t blackballed prior to now. I’m no lawyer but that would be my case for him. He’s getting a reduced deal late and after the anthem protests have died down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

I've seen you comment on this issue a few times, and from my understanding, I don't think you completely understand it. 

Reid's claims involve being blacklisted for a time, not entirely, and not necessarily ongoing. I could be mistaken but I believe he claims he was blacklisted for a set time period in the offseason that prevented him from finding employment. That timeframe could have since ended and still would keep his lawsuit valid.

Also, he doesn't have to prove that all 32 teams colluded against him, just that 2 teams did. Even if he were to get a contract offer from 30 different teams, and was able to prove that 2 teams conspired against him, then he would then be technically correct in the fact that there was collusion against him and he would then win the suit. 

The biggest issue is actually providing proof of the collusion though, which is why he most likely won't win the suit. Unless there is documented evidence from two owners or GM's or higher ups that emphatically state that he is to not be considered for the roster, then he probably won't win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think, under the right circumstances, KC would be the team with the most desperate offer.  Do we want to go from 8 to 31, no, but it would give us 2 extra day 2 picks and a future high pick.  And yes, it would be a huge risk for Morgan.  The only way I see it is the Chiefs added a player at a need position and some day 2 picks and possibly a first in 2026.  Desperate, but the Chiefs are in win now made and their OL was just exposed, which is exactly what the Kendrick Lamar halftime show was about. 
    • He said himself in his interviews today that he is more of a chess piece to move around and mentioned he's been working a lot with Nolan Smith jr.
    • Here is how we move back:  First, Offensive tackle is not good in free agency.  The Draft: The Jets need a LT.  Will Campbell is the consensus best Tackle in the draft, and they take him.  All those other teams (I count 6-8 who need a T--and I see KC STARVING for one after the Super Bowl) decide they need to move up to get the best pure LT in the draft, Kelvin Banks out of Texas.  After Banks and Campbell, there is a pretty sharp drop in talent level, dropping from A players to B players. The next two OTs are Right Tackles, so anyone needing a LT would have to hope the fifth overall OT, Wyatt Milum (arguably) would be there at the end of the first round.  Knowing that so many bidders are doing the same thing and they all have phones, I honestly think that Campbell or Banks is there when the Panthers pick and the phone will be ringing.  If they both go before the Panthers pick, crickets.  Here is the Math: Likely to be gone when Panthers pick: Ward, QB Carter, Edge Sanders, QB Graham, DL Hunter, WR/CB Likely to be available when Panthers pick:  There are 2 picks before the Panthers pick once those five get gone.  Among those are these players: McMillan WR Johnson, CB Will Campbell, OT James Pearce, Edge Javon Walker, Superhero.  If we only had 10 more.  (LB) Kelvin Banks, OT Now, if I am a GM on a team that needs an OT, I feel fairly strong that an OT is not going in the top 5.  I am working on potential trades for the seventh and eighth picks, ready to make a deal as soon as Campbell or Banks goes off the board. The Raiders pick 6th--they have needs at OT, WR, and CB if you assume they sign a QB in free agency; I think Darnold goes there, personally.   Regardless, there are no QBs worth #7 overall (unless Sanders falls), so they will draft an OT or CB--in my view,.  They are going to shop in free agency with a lot of $$$.  I am guessing they get their CB then.  the Raiders' will likely draft OT Campbell, but do not rule out TMac:   Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Offensive Tackle Cornerback Wide Receiver Running Back The Jets pick 8th.  Of course, their phone will be ringing off the hook for Banks if this happens, and the Jets have many needs now that Rodgers and Adams are gone.  While they too need an OT, they have more pressing needs as well.  Edge rusher is their biggest need listed here after QB, but their defense was ranked #3 in the NFL last year (I was surprised).  Their offense was ranked 23rd.  They will be focused on revamping the Offense with the losses of Rodgers and Adams.  I see them taking a T or Tmac.  Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Edge-Rusher Wide Receiver Safety Interior Defensive Line Offensive Tackle In this scenario, the only ways the Panthers can trade back is: 1. If the Raiders do not take an OT and the Jets do. 2. If the Jets refuse trade offers and take the best available edge or WR at #7. 3. Both OTs are gone and a team wants the best CB or WR in the draft and is willing trade up.  I do not see a lot of depth in this draft at CB or #1 WR.  What may cause the Panthers to stay put and pick:  1. Edge.  They see Pearce or Green as part of the second-tier edges and need one of them. 2. They like TMac and see the offense taking the next step with him, knowing they can address IDL in round 2 and have Clowney and Wonnum for another season.  3.  The do not re-sign Mike Jax and need an outside CB and have the chance to draft Johnson to pair with Horn.  4.  They fall in love with Walker and Evero develops a boner on how to use him properly.  From this perspective, I would give the chance of trade back slightly under 50% I would speculate that if we draft, we take Pearce, Johnson, or McMillan.  I do not see Walker being a good fit here, but I understand why some of you like him.
×
×
  • Create New...