Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Collusion case against NFL has not been dropped


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mc52beast said:

If anything, this goes to show that hiring Reid was a business decision. The Panthers realized that starting Jones would possibly result in losses and less revenue than they could possibly lose by hiring Reid. Ultimately, no one is going to care if he protests or not so long as the Panthers win. The problem with Reid and Kaep protesting before was that the team wasn't performing as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

There was more to Reid than the alleged collusion/blackballing which could be because of the concussions he had that could be the reason no teams would touch him but Panthers are taking a risk no other team even tried to do and sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...yet. That could change.

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

The only thing I could think of is that his lawyer might argue that Tepper was not an NFL owner at the time Reid filed the suit.

It's weak, but hey...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

Also, everyone seems to forget that Kaep was an asshole right from the beginning. Being an asshole, declining ability, along with extra baggage doesn't make anyone else want to sign a player like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

Doesn’t mean he wasn’t blackballed prior to now. I’m no lawyer but that would be my case for him. He’s getting a reduced deal late and after the anthem protests have died down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how you're going to win a case claiming collusion to blackball you from the league when you're on an NFL roster.

I've seen you comment on this issue a few times, and from my understanding, I don't think you completely understand it. 

Reid's claims involve being blacklisted for a time, not entirely, and not necessarily ongoing. I could be mistaken but I believe he claims he was blacklisted for a set time period in the offseason that prevented him from finding employment. That timeframe could have since ended and still would keep his lawsuit valid.

Also, he doesn't have to prove that all 32 teams colluded against him, just that 2 teams did. Even if he were to get a contract offer from 30 different teams, and was able to prove that 2 teams conspired against him, then he would then be technically correct in the fact that there was collusion against him and he would then win the suit. 

The biggest issue is actually providing proof of the collusion though, which is why he most likely won't win the suit. Unless there is documented evidence from two owners or GM's or higher ups that emphatically state that he is to not be considered for the roster, then he probably won't win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...