Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I was against signing Reid...

t96

By t96,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, tiger7_88 said:

Getting signed by a team probably doesn't do much for proving the "collusion" that he and many seem to believe in so very strongly.

I hope for the best for Reid and the defense's performance.

I dont think that ends it though...  he was colluded against prior to Tepper assuming control of our franchise.  So, i still think he was colluded against by all the other owners.  I dont think it's coincidence that the new owner is the one that signs him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, Proudiddy said:

I dont think that ends it though...  he was colluded against prior to Tepper assuming control of our franchise.  So, i still think he was colluded against by all the other owners.  I dont think it's coincidence that the new owner is the one that signs him.

That's what I figured his lawyer would argue. Worth remembering though that Tepper was the league's choice (and might not have been Richardson's). It's not like he wasn't already part of the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Porn Shop Clerk Enthusiast

Porn Shop Clerk

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

I'll grant that Reid might be more athletically gifted than Minter was, but overall I still have to go with Mike.

That could change. We'll see.

Even though Reids numbers have been slipping, he's still made more pro bowls than Minter.

Also his numbers started dropping when that team became a dumpster fire after Harbaugh left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I dont think that ends it though...  he was colluded against prior to Tepper assuming control of our franchise.  So, i still think he was colluded against by all the other owners.  I dont think it's coincidence that the new owner is the one that signs him.

Because that's what a new owner would do who was just approved by all of the previous owners to own a franchise in a league prized above all others... try to embarrass and "one-up" them.

In a league that requires VOTES AMONG THE OWNERS to move any chance of any kind of change along.

Makes PERFECT sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted

h

20 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I dont think that ends it though...  he was colluded against prior to Tepper assuming control of our franchise.  So, i still think he was colluded against by all the other owners.  I dont think it's coincidence that the new owner is the one that signs him.

Collusion is going to be exceedingly difficult to prove, unless they have some witnesses to discussions, or better yet, some piece of email being passed around.  Otherwise, the owners can say that they didn't want the attention, but didn't make any agreements with other owners.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pup McBarky Proficient

Pup McBarky

Posted
Posted

I hope and pray Eric believes every other owner colluded against him. I want him to play in such a way that all the other owners will be crying that they didn't sign him. I want him to stay healthy, primarily, but I also want him laying some SHOULDER wood into every back and receiver that dares step into HIS area. I want him angry and vengeful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...