Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Reid: FS or SS


luke nukem

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, Dex said:

Safety is interchangeable in our system. But if I remember correctly Reid excels in box safety assignments and zone coverage. He's not a speedster but he's rarely out of position. He will be a great addition to this secondary. 

I had read that he had better success at SF at FS under Harbaugh (I think?) but was moved to SS by the coaches that followed and then moved to slot CB his last year there.

Would like to see Reid at FS and Adams at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

I had read that he had better success at SF at FS under Harbaugh (I think?) but was moved to SS by the coaches that followed and then moved to slot CB his last year there.

Would like to see Reid at FS and Adams at SS.

I wouldn't get too attached to the FS/SS terms but yes I would like to put our two best safeties on the field as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Primarily would assume he's in the robber role and more in the box. Defensive scheme doesn't call for much need for speed with our safeties and is more reliant on our linebackers for that role. Intelligence is much more valued, and Eric Reid is very much so. Plus, safeties are interchangeable in this defense.

Adams likely plays high more often. Even then, he's still solid there as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Colin Jones ran a 4.3

Sorry sir, you're missing my point. I am well aware that there are players faster than Eric Reid. I am also aware that Colin Jones was faster than Eric Reid. 

 

Colin Jones was brought in to be a Special Teams Ace, not a starter. Eric Reid was a former 1st round pick who wasn't given a fair shake because he took a knee. We all seen Colin Jones play last week, I'm surprised you have the audacity to put them in the same sentence. This was not a post to say that Reid is really fast. Someone made a comment earlier that Eric Reid was too slow to play FS and that because of that, he should play more in the box. My post was to refute that, not to get into a pissing contest about who's faster. I am also aware that you can be fast and suck, but if you've watched an ounce of football in the last 5 years, then you should know that Eric Reid doesn't suck.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DaGreat_98 said:

Please don't think Eric Reid is a slow safety, he predominantly plays FS but can play a plethora of positions. It was noted he ran a 4.49 at his Pro Day, I don't think that's slow

Its fast enough

Here's some other notable Saftey times

Harrison Smith- 4.57

Kevin Byard- 4.5

Malcom Jenkins- 4.54

Landon Collins- 4.53

Eric Weddle- 4.48

Micah Hyde- 4.56

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, FugAllY'all said:

He's best as an in the box safety but we have a team stacked with tacklers and run defenders. His job needs to be playing deep in pass coverage, if he's making a lot of tackles things probably aren't going to well.

We do but we dont have that guy who can help cover that slot or TE.  Which is what your box safety.

You know those TEs and slots that beat Collin Jones like a drum.  He'll be covering those guys.

 

Theres a video on one of these threads of him blanketing Evan Engram last year.  The most athletic TE in the NFL 6'3 235 and ran a 4.42.  

Reid is 110% what we need.  Heck and as a in the box guy, he'll be covering Kamara on those short passes where he kills people 

 

 

Good in the box safties are one of the more important positions on the D now.  Because they are covering your quick checkdown options for a QB.  Like when we see Cam get it out to the TE or CMC quick to alleviate a pass rush.  Thus the reason why Keanu Neal was so impactful to Atl's defense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...