Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Reid: FS or SS


luke nukem

Recommended Posts

Safety is interchangeable in our system. But if I remember correctly Reid excels in box safety assignments and zone coverage. He's not a speedster but he's rarely out of position. He will be a great addition to this secondary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sharkkiller said:

I may be wrong, but Reid has always played FS. So it is a perfect fit with the old man. And we can groom Gaulden behind two veterans and give him time to grow.

He started as a FS then was moved to SS a year or two ago then lost that job and became a hybrid SS/LB for most of last year. Similar to how we were supposed to use Shaq.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep, we've put little designation between the two safety positions for a long time now. Pretty sure Fox employed a similar approach.

Been reported that he'll play strong safety, for what it's worth.

I'd have put him at free, but I acknowledge it may not mean as much in our system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...