Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Gordon!


Trill OG

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jumpman910 said:

Pats, Eagles, jets and 49ers had confirmed interest and you gotta imagine the Rams did as well.

Funny how teams that went to the superbowl and have wr needs want to take a flyer on Gordon. 

It's even funnier how many big name and "huge potential" WRs the Pats have swung and missed on. It's been literally dozens. The only one, and yes there is only one, they hit on was Moss and his time there was very short lived despite the historic season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, t96 said:

It's even funnier how many big name and "huge potential" WRs the Pats have swung and missed on. It's been literally dozens. The only one, and yes there is only one, they hit on was Moss and his time there was very short lived despite the historic season. 

Most have been guys who were washed before showing up, if he stays out of trouble he'll be in his prime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

Pats, Eagles, jets and 49ers had confirmed interest and you gotta imagine the Rams did as well.

Funny how teams that went to the superbowl and have wr needs want to take a flyer on Gordon. 

Teams like that generally have enough depth to absorb the hit if he screws up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Teams like that generally have enough depth to absorb the hit if he screws up again.

And at the moment neither team does. Alshon is still out, Wallace has a leg fracture and Agholor has the same production as funchess.

And the pats wr are worse outside of Julian 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Teams like that generally have enough depth to absorb the hit if he screws up again.

what happened the last time we had some one that couldn't stay off the weed? How can anyone say he is "low risk"? No matter how good someone is if he is not allowed to play he is useless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

And at the moment neither team does. Alshon is still out, Wallace has a leg fracture and Agholor has the same production as funchess.

And the pats wr are worse outside of Julian 

In part because they've been picking up guys that didn't produce elsewhere (Dorsett and Cooks, who's now gone, for example).

Whenever you're analyzing what the Patriots do, you have to factor in Belichick's ego. Belichick firmly believes he could take a squad of high schoolers to the Super Bowl. That's why he'll go after guys that have been failures elsewhere because he thinks he'll turn them into stars.

The reality on that front though is that he's failed at it more often than people think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

In part because they've been picking up guys that didn't produce elsewhere (Dorsett and Cooks, who's now gone, for example).

whenever you're analyzing the Patriots, you have to factor in Belichick's ego. Belichick firmly believes he could take a squad of high schoolers to the Super Bowl. that's why he'll go after guys that have been failures elsewhere because he thinks he'll turn them into stars.

The reality on that front though is that he's failed at it more often than people think.

Having a QB like Brady has done wonders in masking his screw ups like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wud35 said:

what happened the last time we had some one that couldn't stay off the weed? How can anyone say he is "low risk"? No matter how good someone is if he is not allowed to play he is useless. 

Yep.

I hear people say he's not a bad person. It doesn't really matter if he's a bad person. In all likelihood, a good portion of the guys on our roster already are probably dicks.

Personality isn't the issue. Dependability is.

Have said it many a times:  Never put yourself in position to have to depend on somebody who's proven that they're not dependable.

If you're on the seventeenth cycle of saying "no no, this time he's really changed", that's just not a good sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...