Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't be a pessimist. We didn't just win, we dominated.


TN05

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

dumb red zone turnover, olsen out. scoreboard didn't reflect the level of beatdown administered and the hiccups don't reflect the team's capability.

we had a bad day and still dominated for four quarters.

i don't think it was a bad game at all. Handful of miscues that can be cleaned up and its things that are separate concerns then what a lot of people thought when coming in. The receivers aren't as much as a strong point as we thought, but the D can be nasty if we get pressure. Cam hitting his check downs and playing smart football, CJ Anderson being the revitalized JStew I was hoping he'd be. At least we aren't losing our poo besides the ones on here wanting Rivera fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RumHam said:

In all honesty, the score should have been 30-8. Stop making CMC a short yardage back. That fumble at the 3 really ruined our rhythm. The difference is this year is that i think we will improve on playcalling as the season evolves.

Yeah CJ is a better runner at the goal line and trying to make CMC someone he's not isn't going to work. At the end of the day we picked the 4th best back last year. I still say we were foolish picking a back when we could have had Howard, Lattimore, or Hooker. Then taken Cooks in the second. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

We can't leave that many points on the field and win next week in Atlanta.  They are going to definitely put up 20+ at home.

Maybe, but you can never know for certain.  In their last five games going back to last season, the Foulcan'ts have put up 12, 10, 26, 22, and 13 points.  Its safe to say their offense is struggling right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...