Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New owner, new oc, new dc, same old BS.


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Sevy87 said:

We won! Everybody new the Oline was banged up. Week 1 fuging chill bunch of divas.

This! To the idiots bitching about everything after the win did you even watch football before? I saw it coming when I was reading the injury reports coming out of camp.

I’ve been telling friends that if we just make the playoffs this year it will be a win.

If we hadn’t been bit by the injury bug I feel like we could have gone somewhere this year. But after camp and week one just making playoffs is going to be a huge win.

people need to learn to match there expectations to the teams potential not what they hope or want to happen.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Need to give this team a break. That online wasn’t great before injuries 

give them to the game after the bye

Yep. And regardless of what people think, Dallas has a good Front 7. We were not playing slappys out there. They get paid too.

In the flip side, our Front 7 wrecked their vaunted Oline all game long too. 6 sacks against that line and shutting down Zeke is a major accomplishment.

Everyone, myself included, isnt happy with 16 points on offense, but I think we have room to get a lot better.  But it's still way better than the one good drive Dallas had for the whole game.

We got room to get better. Be happy to be 1-0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

16 points on offense

As you mentioned, they have a really good D and we gave up points on the opening drive. Shoulda been 24 points, prolly more, but a win is a win and I'm sure the offense will fix some things. The OL worries me going into Atlanta, but our defense looked dominant, so hopefully we come away next week 2-0, ugly wins or not. As someone, somewhere has said, rather win ugly than lose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Nate Dogg said:

What was up with the sequence of events before the half? Pretty depressing that Ron is not even willing to take a shot at the end zone from there.

I mentioned in another thread, but Ron intimated it was actually Cam who made the call to take the FG after the sack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dallas has a really good defense and I think it's okay for our offense to have some growing pains. What is alarming to me is that it seems the staff has a lot, if not too much faith in injured players. They mismanaged Luke yesterday and should have called a timeout when he was clearly winded in the endzone.

The hit on Daryl was dirty as hell and he would have been hurt if he was 100% healthy but still it's a really bad look and they would be wise to let him rest a couple games.

Olsen probably isn't anyone's fault. At least they drafted Thomas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeez if a week ago I told you that a banged up Panthers team would beat the Cowboys, and both the Saints and Falcons would lose, you’d think we’d have a happy fan base...

I know it wasn’t pretty but in week 1 all you have to do is find a way to win. In 2015 we had 3 or 4 ugly wins to start the season before we hit our stride and the coaches found the best schemes and roles for the players on the roster

Give it time, there is tons of talent and good coaches in this organization and it’ll all come together by mid season 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers34 said:

Jeez if a week ago I told you that a banged up Panthers team would beat the Cowboys, and both the Saints and Falcons would lose, you’d think we’d have a happy fan base...

This is why I stay away from here once the game starts. Too much like 12-year-old girls ranting about how unfair life is because some boy said "hi" to some other girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Silent Majority said:

would you trust that line to hold up and not get Cam killed, when you've already blanked them the first half?

It doesn't have to be some long developing 7 second play. We had 1 on 1 match ups all over the field the entire game. Do like every other team in the league... Snap it and instantly throw up a fade into the end zone and hope one of your guys can make a play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...