New underwear-eating challenge for this week: No Delhomme turnovers

[Sam Mills Fan]

Here's a dilemma for you.

Would you rather have a Panther win with Delhomme having no turnovers?

or

Would you rather have a Panther loss with Delhomme having at least one turnover?

So basically what I'm trying to say, is a Panther victory worth you eating some boxers?

I'd rather have a Panther win with a Delhomme turnover thrown in there somewhere.

[Sam Mills Fan]

For the record, the last time Jake had a completely turnover-free day was against the Saints in the final regular season game last year.

[E CaT PanTHer]

I'd rather have a Panther win with a Delhomme turnover thrown in there somewhere.

Well I'm saying if you had to choose between those two options ?? Tough question eh ??

[GRWatcher]

They key to the wildcat isn't just both backs on the field but take jake off of it. Never will understand why teams run the wildcat with the QB lined up as a WR.

To throw the defense off so they don't get the right personnel on the field to stop the wildcat and therefore it has a better chance of succeeding. If the QB isn't in the huddle, the D will know what the play will be. Last year, the Ravens even threw to Flacco who was lined up wide. And he caught it. I've seen it where the QB runs off the field & a WR runs on at the last second after the huddle breaks but that is very, very risky. Could get called for a false start or illegal procedure or delay of game.

[therealmjl]

Hahaha...awesome.

[Jangler]

Considering we will run it 40 times on the bills you actually have a legit shot at eating some cotton here.

10 passes and 60 rushes between Dwill and JStew.

[MurkN]

At this rate you'll never be eating any underwear