Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Taylor Moton PFF stat


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, JakeDel5674 said:
4. Orlando Brown, OT, Baltimore Ravens

The Ravens have certainly been giving Brown every opportunity possible to prove himself. Including the Hall of Fame game, Brown has played a ridiculous 174 snaps already this preseason. He’s only been off the field for 36 of the Ravens’ 210 offensive plays so far. The Oklahoma product has showed himself well as he’s allowed only three hurries, zero hits and zero sacks in his 111 pass-blocking snaps.

Crazy enough, so is Orlando Brown. But, but, but, Jackson. But, but, not a position of need. But, but, Combine bad! But, but, Matt Kalil healthy! The Huddle's GMs>

We weren't going to draft a 3rd RT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, JakeDel5674 said:

Stronger no doubt, but we needed someone like Brown as well in the Draft. We could've traded up for him, but nope. We chose ZERO line help. So, so, stupid. 

Problem is.

Had we traded up for him

 

We wouldnt have gotten Ian Thomas and Marquis Haynes.  2 guys who have turned heads and looked like studs.  Thomas looks like he is going to be the real deal with us down the road.

 

Yes we couldve had Brown to compete with Moton now, who just may be better for that LT.

But had Manhurtz trotting out there at TE and no Pass rushing weapon like Haynes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Problem is.

Had we traded up for him

 

We wouldnt have gotten Ian Thomas and Marquis Haynes.  2 guys who have turned heads and looked like studs.  Thomas looks like he is going to be the real deal with us down the road.

 

Yes we couldve had Brown to compete with Moton now, who just may be better for that LT.

But had Manhurtz trotting out there at TE and no Pass rushing weapon like Haynes

I think we could've gotten Haynes in the later rounds, and I was thinking of trading a future third for him. And maybe a 5th this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, losing both starting OTs is a big blow but I'm hoping we only really miss Williams. I'm hopeful that losing Kalil will he a blessing in disguise and Moton ends up being an upgrade who wouldn't have gotten a chance had Kalil not gotten hurt. Losing Amini is absolutely addition by subtraction. He is not an NFL caliber OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't know why we didn't release Ryan Kalil to pay for Norwell, and promote Tyler Larsen. It makes ABSOLUTELY no sense to be paying Ryan given the fact he's essentially guaranteed to miss half the season due to injury based on the last two seasons.

Kalil / Norwell / Larsen / Turner / Williams -- Moton / Silatolu / Van Roten / Sirles / UDFA 

To me still makes more sense than what we did over the off-season, you don't let an All-Pro YOU DEVELOPED go for a player looking to retire AFTER this season anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...