Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Samuel in a no win situation this season?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Him and Byrd have looked good, as they should against practice squad players. I just hope both stay healthy. 

 

Maybe be next season when Funchess and Smith are gone

Byrd and Samuel look good when they played during the season last year though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't seen Smith do a damn thing to and don't give me this he has veteran leadership. Cut him and save 5 million to go get u some more oline help. I don't care who gives me poo. He is not worth it to be sitting Samuel on the bench or bryd not making the 53. The people on here have gone crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the reception data for the first 2 games of the preseason.  If Samuel can keep up the kind of production he's had in these 2 games you won't have to worry about him making the field.

1753017541_WRTEdatacomp.png.d23e226d2953ad50e2a4a10bbf66dcdf.png

More discussion of this table here:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funchess will see the field a LOT.  Outside of that? I think playing time is largely an open competition.  I mean I know Smith will start off the season as the guy....but 3 WR sets? Moore and Samuel likely should get equal time until proven otherwise.  And also, Smith is great going deep but his overall game isn’t anything special IMO.   Samuel and Moore could eat into his reps later on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, Curtis Samuel might be the second best receiver on our entire roster today. We don't even have a clear-cut number one right now, any one of Funchess, Moore or Samuel could emerge as our top playmaker on the outside. He's shown everything you want from a starting WR: route running, speed, hands, and position versatility. They would be insane to not to give a second round draft pick who's healthy and looking productive as many chances to succeed as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

It’s inevitable Samuel will unfortunately have his playing time limited by Rivera’s “de facto nod for the Vets over the youngins” philosophy.

However, I still stand by my belief he has the most potential out of all the Panthers WRs.

Personally, I like where we sit with Funchess, Moore, Byrd, Samuel, and Wright. With CMC and Olsen eating up touches its gonna be slim pickings for the wide receivers as is. Funchess is a better version of Wright but the three speed guys I mentioned are better versions of Smith. 

I think Byrd showed too much last season to be cut and all of our receivers could remain pretty inexpensive due to CMC and Olsen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, FugAllY'all said:

Uh, Curtis Samuel might be the second best receiver on our entire roster today. We don't even have a clear-cut number one right now, any one of Funchess, Moore or Samuel could emerge as our top playmaker on the outside. He's shown everything you want from a starting WR: route running, speed, hands, and position versatility. They would be insane to not to give a second round draft pick who's healthy and looking productive as many chances to succeed as possible.

Well....he hasn’t shown everything.  I mean preseason is preseason.  Samuel spending a lot of time vs backups and against defenses playing preseason D (which often isn’t about playcalling to stop a given play as much as it is about testing certain players with certain assignments)

not knocking Samuel though.  But I think the regular season will be an open competition.  Dudes who make plays will end up getting more time. 

Funchess’ niche is about the only given.  Smith, Samuel, Moore and Byrd will be a jumble until players make plays 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...