Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game of Thrones - Season 8


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

It's the final season so theres that. Heard Season 8 is going to be around February/March 2019? Anyone else heard that?

The #thelastwomanstanding hashtag is interesting though. That has my head spinning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

It's the final season so theres that. Heard Season 8 is going to be around February/March 2019? Anyone else heard that?

The #thelastwomanstanding hashtag is interesting though. That has my head spinning.

I heard April 2019 but yeah, right around that timing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jimmy said:

It's the final season so theres that. Heard Season 8 is going to be around February/March 2019? Anyone else heard that?

The #thelastwomanstanding hashtag is interesting though. That has my head spinning.

She’s spilling the beans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So... I heard the rumor that faceless god is actually Jon Snow father... Rhaegar.  That’s why he took care of Arya because she looked just like Jon Snow mother.  hence the names H’ghar vs. Rhaegar.  Apparently no one ever found Rhaegar body after he was killed.  He fall into the river and river took him away and he was presumed dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they are done filming.

IIRC the actresses behind Cersei and the Waif both replied to Maisie's post calling her "Queen."

Maybe Arya is the last one standing?

 

I'm not sure when it will air, other than 2019. I'm still holding out hope that they can get all the editing/CGI done in time to get it out at the end of this year.

Yes, 6 episodes... Some/most probably clocking in at over an hour.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...