Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Monogamy


Dex

Recommended Posts

Do you remember the point at which you knew that your significant other was the person you wanted to spend the rest of your life with?

 

What's the secret to a happy relationship?

 

Can monogamy work past the point of having children?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our only child is 9 years old.  Been with his mother and only her since 2001.  Yes it can work, I have no plans and as far as I know she has no plans to ever be with anyone else.

For me it just felt different I think partially I had matured enough that having a good friend/partner/supporter was as important as going out and getting into so mischief.  I look now and it seems exhausting to be single - I want to come home and feel comfy and happy and look forward to family time.

 

Its also works that we understand we are just animals - I can look I can flirt I can watch porn but she remains priority one.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fryfan said:

Our only child is 9 years old.  Been with his mother and only her since 2001.  Yes it can work, I have no plans and as far as I know she has no plans to ever be with anyone else.

For me it just felt different I think partially I had matured enough that having a good friend/partner/supporter was as important as going out and getting into so mischief.  I look now and it seems exhausting to be single - I want to come home and feel comfy and happy and look forward to family time.

 

Its also works that we understand we are just animals - I can look I can flirt I can watch porn but she remains priority one.

 

 

I'm currently single but I don't like going out. I mainly stay in and work, read, Netflix etc. I am on dating apps like Bumble & Tinder but mainly use them as an ego boost. I don't plan on being in a relationship because I enjoy my freedom. To be honest I don't even need to have sex. However, I do know at some point I will want to have kids. I'm just not sure that I want a partner because to me monogamy seems so bizarre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dex said:

I'm currently single but I don't like going out. I mainly stay in and work, read, Netflix etc. I am on dating apps like Bumble & Tinder but mainly use them as an ego boost. I don't plan on being in a relationship because I enjoy my freedom. To be honest I don't even need to have sex. However, I do know at some point I will want to have kids. I'm just not sure that I want a partner because to me monogamy seems so bizarre.

I know two married couples with kids that are open.  I dont think its extremely uncommon. I think it requires a really strong friendship and mutual values of how to raise a family.  

With kids - that is top love top priority though and that is the change even in open relationships.  If you catching a hook up on tinder means little johnny misses practice - that is where the snap will come down and crash things.  I dont think even the most open marriage can survive kids if those kids are priority one by both parents.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fryfan said:

I know two married couples with kids that are open.  I dont think its extremely uncommon. I think it requires a really strong friendship and mutual values of how to raise a family.  

With kids - that is top love top priority though and that is the change even in open relationships.  If you catching a hook up on tinder means little johnny misses practice - that is where the snap will come down and crash things.  I dont think even the most open marriage can survive kids if those kids are priority one by both parents.

 

I'm of the opinion that you don't need two parents living together to raise a child. Does it help? Probably. I was raised by my mom on her own and I would see my dad occasionally whenever he decided to sober up and grab a burger or something. But I believe as humans, our main purpose in life is to have children. My ideal situation would be to have a child with someone that I knew to be a good person, responsible both with their money and time and willing to do whatever it takes to see that their child succeeds. I don't want a live in a partner though, at least not at this point in my life. I don't think I'd find success by being up front with women about my intentions though lmao.

 

Who knows how I'll feel a year from now though. Congrats on your successful relationship though @Fryfan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2018 at 2:46 PM, Dex said:

I'm of the opinion that you don't need two parents living together to raise a child. Does it help? Probably. I was raised by my mom on her own and I would see my dad occasionally whenever he decided to sober up and grab a burger or something. But I believe as humans, our main purpose in life is to have children. My ideal situation would be to have a child with someone that I knew to be a good person, responsible both with their money and time and willing to do whatever it takes to see that their child succeeds. I don't want a live in a partner though, at least not at this point in my life. I don't think I'd find success by being up front with women about my intentions though lmao.

 

Who knows how I'll feel a year from now though. Congrats on your successful relationship though @Fryfan

I for one cannot see having a kid(s) and living apart from them even part time.   Even if the mother is no more then a great friend and roommate I see a ton of value waking up each morning knowing I will see my son, coming home each day and he will be there.

To spend time while he lives elsewhere especially during the younger years seems like torture to me.  I understand plenty of people are raised by single parents just I as a parent would not want that to be the default.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

26 minutes ago, Fryfan said:

I for one cannot see having a kid(s) and living apart from them even part time.   Even if the mother is no more then a great friend and roommate I see a ton of value waking up each morning knowing I will see my son, coming home each day and he will be there.

To spend time while he lives elsewhere especially during the younger years seems like torture to me.  I understand plenty of people are raised by single parents just I as a parent would not want that to be the default.

 

 

Pretty much.  Every other week thing would be torture.  The freedom you have to do what you want every other week wouldn't be worth not having my children those weeks instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2018 at 1:34 PM, Dex said:

I'm currently single but I don't like going out. I mainly stay in and work, read, Netflix etc. I am on dating apps like Bumble & Tinder but mainly use them as an ego boost. I don't plan on being in a relationship because I enjoy my freedom. To be honest I don't even need to have sex. However, I do know at some point I will want to have kids. I'm just not sure that I want a partner because to me monogamy seems so bizarre.

I've been with my wife for 14 years now and we have 3 kids; I daresay I'm more attracted to her every day and have a way bigger libido now than I did 10 years ago. She is my partner in every sense of the word and I'd be absolutely devastated to lose her. That's not to say that I don't think other women are attractive/enjoy being around them (or that my wife doesn't share the same opinion about other men), or that there isn't anyone else in the world that could make me happy/that I could eventually love in a similar fashion, but I've no desire to test that theory.

Flipping the question a bit, what do you gain from not being monogamous/in a monogamous relationship that you feel is necessary to your happiness? Honest question, as even though I like being social and the company of others I've always been a 'relationship guy' and greatly prefer a deep connection with someone than a revolving cast of partners. I also value/prioritize intimacy and a sexual relationship which may differ from your priorities as well.

On 6/26/2018 at 10:39 AM, Datawire said:

If monogamy is such a good thing then why are humans so bad at it?

As humans are bad at lots of things that are inherently beneficial for us - eating right, exercise, sleep, impulse control, saving money, not abusing drugs, etc. - your point isn't really applicable but I assume your sentiment is that monogamy seems to be against human nature, which is one side of the argument.  The partnership/family approach is seen in nature with lots of theories as to why vs. a more communal society but the single-sexual partner model is a social construct so yeah, limitation itself might be tough even if beneficial in the context of society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He said himself in his interviews today that he is more of a chess piece to move around and mentioned he's been working a lot with Nolan Smith jr.
    • Here is how we move back:  First, Offensive tackle is not good in free agency.  The Draft: The Jets need a LT.  Will Campbell is the consensus best Tackle in the draft, and they take him.  All those other teams (I count 6-8 who need a T--and I see KC STARVING for one after the Super Bowl) decide they need to move up to get the best pure LT in the draft, Kelvin Banks out of Texas.  After Banks and Campbell, there is a pretty sharp drop in talent level, dropping from A players to B players. The next two OTs are Right Tackles, so anyone needing a LT would have to hope the fifth overall OT, Wyatt Milum (arguably) would be there at the end of the first round.  Knowing that so many bidders are doing the same thing and they all have phones, I honestly think that Campbell or Banks is there when the Panthers pick and the phone will be ringing.  If they both go before the Panthers pick, crickets.  Here is the Math: Likely to be gone when Panthers pick: Ward, QB Carter, Edge Sanders, QB Graham, DL Hunter, WR/CB Likely to be available when Panthers pick:  There are 2 picks before the Panthers pick once those five get gone.  Among those are these players: McMillan WR Johnson, CB Will Campbell, OT James Pearce, Edge Javon Walker, Superhero.  If we only had 10 more.  (LB) Kelvin Banks, OT Now, if I am a GM on a team that needs an OT, I feel fairly strong that an OT is not going in the top 5.  I am working on potential trades for the seventh and eighth picks, ready to make a deal as soon as Campbell or Banks goes off the board. The Raiders pick 6th--they have needs at OT, WR, and CB if you assume they sign a QB in free agency; I think Darnold goes there, personally.   Regardless, there are no QBs worth #7 overall (unless Sanders falls), so they will draft an OT or CB--in my view,.  They are going to shop in free agency with a lot of $$$.  I am guessing they get their CB then.  the Raiders' will likely draft OT Campbell, but do not rule out TMac:   Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Offensive Tackle Cornerback Wide Receiver Running Back The Jets pick 8th.  Of course, their phone will be ringing off the hook for Banks if this happens, and the Jets have many needs now that Rodgers and Adams are gone.  While they too need an OT, they have more pressing needs as well.  Edge rusher is their biggest need listed here after QB, but their defense was ranked #3 in the NFL last year (I was surprised).  Their offense was ranked 23rd.  They will be focused on revamping the Offense with the losses of Rodgers and Adams.  I see them taking a T or Tmac.  Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Edge-Rusher Wide Receiver Safety Interior Defensive Line Offensive Tackle In this scenario, the only ways the Panthers can trade back is: 1. If the Raiders do not take an OT and the Jets do. 2. If the Jets refuse trade offers and take the best available edge or WR at #7. 3. Both OTs are gone and a team wants the best CB or WR in the draft and is willing trade up.  I do not see a lot of depth in this draft at CB or #1 WR.  What may cause the Panthers to stay put and pick:  1. Edge.  They see Pearce or Green as part of the second-tier edges and need one of them. 2. They like TMac and see the offense taking the next step with him, knowing they can address IDL in round 2 and have Clowney and Wonnum for another season.  3.  The do not re-sign Mike Jax and need an outside CB and have the chance to draft Johnson to pair with Horn.  4.  They fall in love with Walker and Evero develops a boner on how to use him properly.  From this perspective, I would give the chance of trade back slightly under 50% I would speculate that if we draft, we take Pearce, Johnson, or McMillan.  I do not see Walker being a good fit here, but I understand why some of you like him.
    • we fixed ours in free agency. a rookie is not an immediate answer.
×
×
  • Create New...