Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New policy requires on-field players, personnel to stand for anthem


Manther

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

COMPLETE BULLSHIT. Think its time for a league wide boycott from the players. 

I doubt that will happen. These players aren’t going to want to mess up their money.

Now, what’s probably going to happen is more protests and public stances by those in the stands. Some of the fans will take more of a stance, now. 

Youre going to see normal joes in the stands sitting during the anthem. You’re going to see a lot of that. You’ll see protests outside of the stadiums. You’ll see many give up football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

These are the same type of people who cry and cry about the 2nd amendment after a psychopath easily obtains a gun, usually an assault style weapon and randomly murders 13 innocent people resulting in an uproar for gun control. The  2nd amendment was created in 1791 when the guns used took like 20 mins to load one bullet and were obviously nowhere near the level of destruction and deadliness they are now. Also the same crybaby snowflakes who counter the gun control argument with an idiotic rebuttal like “well garage doors kill people too let’s ban all garage doors” LMAO. 

I'm with you on the flag kneeling. We agree on that issue. However, I'm on the complete opposite of this issue with you. So I guess we will just call it even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ECUPantherFan said:

I'm assuming you live in South Korea, or are at least from there.

Are you allowed to do/say whatever you want at work with no consequences?

Teachers have had courts back their right to sit during the morning pledge.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

You can always tell who has never worked for a big company or in a corporate setting based on how they react to this stuff. Being forced to follow your employer’s rules is not a violation of your freedom, it’s called being an employee

Forced nationalism come up a lot in corporate america?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Fryfan said:

Teachers have had courts back their right to sit during the morning pledge.

 

Assuming your talking about US here and not South Korea as those two are talking about.

Public school system?  Public schools would fall under Public sector and not private.  So they would be protected by first amendment rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

You can always tell who has never worked for a big company or in a corporate setting based on how they react to this stuff. Being forced to follow your employer’s rules is not a violation of your freedom, it’s called being an employee

Professional athletes are not comparable to someone working 9-5 in an office. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MechaZain said:

Professional athletes are not comparable to someone working 9-5 in an office. 

I don't understand this at all.

But if you want me to be perfectly honest...they sure aren't, they are controlled quite a bit more than normal 9-5er's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Wyank said:

Assuming your talking about US here and not South Korea as those two are talking about.

Public school system?  Public schools would fall under Public sector and not private.  So they would be protected by first amendment rights.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/270/616/2501575/

 

This ruling applied to public and private schools.  Teachers & Students.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Walker/Stewart>Mykel on EDGE for me I’d still like to add TMac.    The only two WRs we have contracted beyond this year are XL and Coker (ERFA). Moving forward with TMac and those two feels much better. 
    • The trade below a few years ago was so bad and in favor of the Ravens, tf was Arizona doing Cardinals receive: Marquise Brown and 3rd round pick  Ravens receive: 23rd overall pick 
    • keaton is a former Catamount.  The list I saw had only 2--Sanker and Emmanwori.  But I do recall hearing about Bowman. The theory that we are looking for specific hybrid safeties is upheld by this.  Keaton fits the "type" who can play zone or deep and in the box.  "He's a physical player with a high motor and a nose for the football. He has a good understanding of zone coverage and can play in the box as a force defender. Keaton is a leader and has earned a single-digit jersey number at Temple, a tradition reserved for team leaders." At WCU, he averaged 6.5 tackles per game, leading the team before transferring. Sanker has special teams abilities and a high football IQ.  He can cover TEs and RBs and keeps the play in front.  He would be a nice fit as a depth player.  I did not know they met with Bowman at the SR bowl.  He is more of a free safety who struggles in tackling/run support, but that is not to say he is not versatile within his capabilities. Stark is a SS who is a brutal hitter, but I don't see his hybrid qualities--they met with him at the Combine when everyone was in the building, but that was nearly 2 months ago and I don't think there has been contact since. Emmanwori is who they would love to have in my opinion.  NFL Draft Buzz:  "His ability to play in the box, handle man coverage responsibilities, and deliver bone-crushing hits makes him an ideal fit for defenses that ask their safeties to wear multiple hats." So it seems they are looking for a type.  The Keaton pick is intriguing to me because he is a sleeper who would clearly be there in round 5 or later.  They seem attracted to his characteristics, and he is a thumper who can play deep.  To me, the fact that they want 2 hybrid safeties of a certain type is rather obvious.  Maybe I am forcing a round peg into a square hole, but I love trying to see what skillsets teams value to guess draft picks.
×
×
  • Create New...