Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How ridiculous is the NFCS?


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

This post came out of a discussion on Reddit on RB duos, but it's something to think about. 

  • QBs: Brees, Ryan, Cam, and Jameis
  • RBs: Kamara/Ingram, CMC/Anderson, Freeman/Coleman, and Jones/whoever
  • WRs:  Jones/Sanu, Evans/Jackson, Thomas/Ginn (lol), and Funchess/whoever

That's three top-10 QBs (with two former MVPs and Breesus), and three top-5 running back duos in the same division.  Three of the teams have very solid WR corps as well.  And the Panthers and Falcons had top 10 defenses last year.

Is there any other division in football that's this crazy competitive?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, there isn't.

Last year, three of our teams went to the playoffs and the fourth wasn't that far behind. Divisions that competed head to head with us last season basically got stomped across the board. 

I'm not sure I've seen an entire division so competitive since maybe the 1980s NFC East. And maybe not even then as they had the lackluster St. Louis Cardinals among them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree NFC south is the most competitive, but NFC North is not far behind. 

Im from chicago and watch a lot of Bears football and the only reason bears sucked was because our top 3 wrs were injured, and fox was defensive minded and ignored our offensive needs. 

They now have Allen robinson, taylor gabriel, anthony miller (prospect I was high on) to go along with trey burton, jordan howard, and tarik cohen. Not to mention they had a top 10 defense last year which they never got credit for. 

Aaron rodgers is back and despite losing nelson, they got jimmy graham and on defense, signed wilkerson. Also drafted 2 of the top 5 cbs in the draft.  

Vikings signed sheldon richardson and kirk cousins and get dalvin cook back. They also drafted a top cb mike hughes to go along with their already strong cb core. 

Lions are w.e. which is why NFC North will be second to the south

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These teams build there teams to compete with each other.  Three are top tier teams so each team not only beat up on each other but they can beat any other division in football. 

I think if you take the records of the teams since the realignment you will see the NFCS is top 3 in record.

I did that a couple years ago and the NFCS was the top division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Annoyingly so.

 

If some of the current "blue bloods" played in this division, we wouldn't think of them the same way.

Looking at you Patriots, Green Bay, Seattle, and Steelers.

 

Seattle is about to be fighting for third place in their division. Rams are loaded and the 49ers might be the breakout team of next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the difference between the NFCS and let's say the AFCE...if the Pats had this much competition year in and year out: #1 they wouldn't always get the #1 seed, they wouldn't always win their division and at least one of those SBs wouldn't have happened just from a competitive 17 game season when people get injured and the like.  We kill each other before the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

That's the difference between the NFCS and let's say the AFCE...if the Pats had this much competition year in and year out: #1 they wouldn't always get the #1 seed, they wouldn't always win their division and at least one of those SBs wouldn't have happened just from a competitive 17 game season when people get injured and the like.  We kill each other before the playoffs.

IIRC the Pats have only won the SB when they were the no. 1 seed, and the playoffs when through Fox.

That wouldn't happen nearly as much were they to play in a decent division, much less a tough one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, saints4lifeagain said:

I have a love/hate relationship with the competitiveness of this division. Part of me hates you all and wants you to go 0-16 every year, but I also take pride in the NFCS being one of the best divisions in football.

Rest assured, the feeling is mutual :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...