Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fansided Names Top 5 Panthers of All Time

Toker Smurf

By Toker Smurf,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Defend the Shield! said:

Not having TD here doesn't feel right, but I'm not sure who he'd replace.

Gross did more for us than Mills, as much as I love both.

Kasay should not be overlooked.

 

And it suggests that memories are not that good if we have 3 of the top 5 on the current roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Professor Chaos said:

 I thought the days of this place overvaluing a kicker was over.

I live on the edge.  You could say I am edgy.  If I were an animal, I would be an edgehog. 

Ok, I am done.:poo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

Even though Cam and Luke are still relatively young and it seems like they just got here but I gotta agree that those two are our top two Panthers of all time. Pep would be if he didn't leave for so long or at all, and maybe even if he had come back in '14 instead of last year. Mills is the heart and soul of this organization with TD following him there. Smitty is a legend of course and has a place. I agree with this list for the most part. I couldn't put Luke or Cam above each other though, they're equal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolina Cajun Mentor

Carolina Cajun

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Still Brooklyn said:

I wouldn't put Mills. Dude is a Saint first. I'd actually like to see Moose on that list.

You know there wasn't a team here in carolina when he played for the saints right?  He was legitimately on the very first panthers team, then coached the team and gave the speech that has become our matra, I mean, I don't know how much more "panthers" he could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...