Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anderson: Proven, Many Miles Left, & A Fit


saX man

Recommended Posts

Sauns and Saunas,

There are some major points not being emphasized enough with the CJ Anderson signing. 

This is not a Hurnery 2.0 hype thread, this is a, "This is a strong signing" thread

Oakydokie..

180508_workout_thumb--nfl_medium_540_360

  • With the RB market these days, you deal with the annual early burnout syndrome, early fading, and not finding the right combo platters.  Wendy's spicy chicken and chickfila fries please, animal style.    
  • We just signed a 27 y/o who just had his first 1,000 yard season.  Maybe not his flashiest, but, he eclipsed 1k and is in his prime (prime by today's standards). haute dog, or cat shall I say
  • 1 year prove it deal, he wants it
  • Probably one of the better attitudes of a higher end FA signing we've had in quite some time
  • Don't forget Denver matched an offer sheet for him from Miami to keep him.  That early career overpay got them no takers in the trade market when and it made sense to let those dollars lose.  

He just seems like a really good fit here folks.  We're getting a guy we KNOW is impactful.  We're not hedging our bets on the next hype train and he's a strong fit on multiple levels.  We've got a good full sized runner, ready to go. 

Stewart was better at this point in his career but Anderson splitting with McCaffrey is seriously good.  We are elevated.  

And now, a movie scene

Goodbye Mr Burton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/10/2018 at 9:50 AM, Asurfaholic said:

Why did Denver cut him?

Expand  

Cap space.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/23200091/denver-broncos-release-running-back-cj-anderson

  Quote

Anderson's release or a trade have been possibilities since the end of the season, something Anderson himself acknowledged several times along the way. Broncos coach Vance Joseph outlined a much bigger role for Booker at the league meetings last month.

Anderson's contract also gave the Broncos the ability to move on without any penalty of "dead money" -- salary-cap charges for players no longer on the roster. At $4.5 million, Anderson would have had the fourth-highest base salary at the position for the coming season. But the structure of the deal meant if Anderson was released, the Broncos would not be charged any dead money.

Expand  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we’ve had a few good signings but this is the best of the offseason.  All on paper but we’ve gotten better in the backfield, and  better at wide receiver.   Our DL is a push and there is optimism for the secondary. To me the Norwell gap is still a bit of a question but I think we can get by.  Overall a solid offseason. 

On paper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...