Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brett Kollmann draft recap


Recommended Posts

Pretty much spot on with the offense analysis. Thats great stuff because alot of "professional" talking heads get their info about the team incorrect half the time , this dude is really good at what he does.  

Its great he mentioned us not adressing the oline in the draft and saying how we seem to have so many "space" players, which is very true. No idea if we will actually switch to mostly a quick hitting passing game but it would make sense if the left side of the oline performs poorly. 

IDK about us playing Jackson mostly in nickle and Gaulden at outside CB.. I guess its possible b/c they're rookies and we could be trying just about anything and everything to finally get a functional secondary unit again. But I coulda swore Rivera and Hurney said that they're trying to make Gaulden into a Saftey and they plan to play Jackson alot on the outside? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Pretty much spot on with the offense analysis. Thats great stuff because alot of "professional" talking heads get their info about the team incorrect half the time , this dude is really good at what he does.  

Its great he mentioned us not adressing the oline in the draft and saying how we seem to have so many "space" players, which is very true. No idea if we will actually switch to mostly a quick hitting passing game but it would make sense if the left side of the oline performs poorly. 

IDK about us playing Jackson mostly in nickle and Gaulden at outside CB.. I guess its possible b/c they're rookies and we could be trying just about anything and everything to finally get a functional secondary unit again. But I coulda swore Rivera and Hurney said that they're trying to make Gaulden into a Saftey and they plan to play Jackson alot on the outside? 

Jackson isn't an outside corner. It would be a fail on the coaches part to put him there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Why not?

Doesn't have the technique or size for it at this point in his career. May struggle to get to outside corner type weight. Jackson is RAW, technique wise. People have to understand this isn't a guy that has been playing corner for a long time. You put him outside, in our division against these receivers, you're asking for trouble.

I think he'll prove to be a slot corner his whole career, honestly. He's got the ability to be the best slot guy in football, which is an important position. Maybe he develops into more, but that's where I see him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Donte can.play outside. 

Obviously you wouldn't want him lined up against Evans or Jones, but Ginn, and other normal size receivers, donte can play. 

 

 

Can he? Decently. But he's much better in the slot. He went to DBU for crying out loud. They played him in the slot, where he excelled. 

I've watched every game of the mans career lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

Can he? Decently. But he's much better in the slot. He went to DBU for crying out loud. They played him in the slot, where he excelled. 

I've watched every game of the mans career lol. 

Tbh I’d be ecstatic if we looked at him to play free safety. LSU showed a few looks out of there for him and he reacted and did well.

Of course, he likely won’t. But doesn’t hurt to dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Tbh I’d be ecstatic if we looked at him to play free safety. LSU showed a few looks out of there for him and he reacted and did well.

Of course, he likely won’t. But doesn’t hurt to dream.

I think that would be another area where he'd excel. Again, a position you'd like to see him put some weight on for, but allowing him to sit back and survey and use his speed to attack the ball would be interesting, to say the least. Last year they kind of moved him into the TM7 role. I liked him there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You and I both know there isn't a coach we could or can still hire that can "fix" Bryce Young. Even at mighty Alabama with one of the best modern coaches in college football history Mac Jones was still a better QB than Bryce Young. Mac Jones.... We already know how you feel about Canales on a personal level so in that regard you wanting him fired is not news. You don't have to disguise it behind this shroud of rabble about not fixing Bryce Young. To his credit he somehow had us competive against the Chiefs and the Eagles on the road with #9. But no coaching staff can overcome their starting QB turning the ball over 4 times. We definitely have developed some of our younger offensive pieces. And as far as Evero goes he has earned criticism and if he's fired so be it but in his defense many of us said in the offseason this defensive roster was a disaster waiting to happen given the resources we spent on the offense while neglecting the defense. That was Dan Morgan's plan. He swung too hard toward offense to salvage the Bryce Young trade. That's on him. We can scream about XL all we want but at least he's actually been on the field for the most part. The Brooks pick was a luxury pick at the time and now it is a Hurney level blunder. Dan Morgan has gotten a lot of early praise here when in reality he's unequivocally deserving of significant criticism. But if you say that some people get up in arms because he's a former Panther. Big whoop. He has just as much to prove this upcoming season as Canales. That's why to me in my own personal opinion I say one more season and then if it's more of the same say goodbye to both.
    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
×
×
  • Create New...