Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Christian McCaffrey Is Too Small To Be A Three Down Back"


Saca312

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, BigSyke said:

 

That would be the worst thing he could turn into.

I rather he be an advanced Danny Woodhead then him.

Dude had one good year and disappeared for no fuging reason.

Should have used  John Riggins as a comparison if you were going that route.

 

it’s a joke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CarolinaCat89 said:

you fools who think he looks jacked there..

Hes got his arms folded with a fuging pump, of course hes going to look big. Lean muscle mass looks bigger in photos. The guy is still 200-205, no weight put on. But then again, I've worked out 5x a week for a decade, the average eye doesn't understand fitness photos. 

I was into lifting for years. 6 days a week 6 meals a day 9-10 hours sleep a day. Not saying the dude put on a lot of weight but pretty certain he has put some lean muscle mass in a year of NFL training. To think otherwise is fugin stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pictures are very deceiving.. I remember thinking that CMC was ripped and looked pretty good size in pictures last offseason, but then I saw him on the field compared to other NFL players and he looked tiny in comparison. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leave it to Saca to start these dumbass threads, I'm so tired of hearing that CMC is to small and can not be an every down back. We are going to go into the season with him, cap and fozzy which won't get much playing time. The team is going to feed CMC and he is going to feast. All y'all did was complain about this man last year and he kept proving you wrong. He is going to rush 1k yards and 8 td runs. Then he will have 800 yds catching and 5 tds. Time for y'all to give up on why didn't we get Fournette. Guess what we wasn't giving up all our picks and he didn't fit our offense. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not such much size as body strength, especially in the hips and legs.  In his prime, Jonathan Stewart could move the pile better than most in the league, and his legs looked like tree trunks, yet he wasn't that much bigger weight wise that CMC.  About 225 as I recall.  

 

IMO, it remains to be seen whether CMC can be effective as a power back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Its not such much size as body strength, especially in the hips and legs.  In his prime, Jonathan Stewart could move the pile better than most in the league, and his legs looked like tree trunks, yet he wasn't that much bigger weight wise that CMC.  About 225 as I recall.  

 

IMO, it remains to be seen whether CMC can be effective as a power back.

He is what he is which is a great all purpose back . Tremendous receiver, big play threat and sure handed runner who can improve with maturity and more carries. Look for 15 carries 5 catches per game and over 1500 yards from scrimmage No complaints from me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Mikey818 said:

He is what he is which is a great all purpose back . Tremendous receiver, big play threat and sure handed runner who can improve with maturity and more carries. Look for 15 carries 5 catches per game and over 1500 yards from scrimmage No complaints from me

I agree, I was just commenting on this thread and this particular aspect of his play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s not so much his overall size and weight that I question. But how dynamic and twitchy he is. He’s shifty and quick but I don’t know if He will ever have that skill of planting and exploding upfield leaving people behind. Which is fine. He still had a really good rookie season imo. 

He needs to be included in every passing offense discussion/debate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rubi said:

It’s not so much his overall size and weight that I question. But how dynamic and twitchy he is. He’s shifty and quick but I don’t know if He will ever have that skill of planting and exploding upfield leaving people behind. Which is fine. He still had a really good rookie season imo. 

He needs to be included in every passing offense discussion/debate. 

Tiki barber was 200 pounds and got over 2000 yards from scrimmage a few times. Cmc is a little bigger and probably a better receiver than tiki 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...