Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Norv Turner Possibly Be Implementing A New Approach To His Scheme?


Saca312

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

What this probably indicates is a shift in Norv's philosophy. While I'm sure Air Coryell will be a large part of his repertoire, I also feel like he's looking to modernize his offense to fit today's NFL.

 

34 minutes ago, Cyberjag said:

Cam is unlike any QB he's ever worked with.

This. Norv is adjusting for Cam and I'm glad to see it. I was skeptical about Norv's hiring simply because what we have is all new to him and I wasn't sure he could adjust. Prove me wrong, Norv!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I think it translates to fans want a big back.

Emmitt Smith wasn't big.

Tomlinson wasn't big.....same size as CAP

Emmitt was only a little bigger than cmc and slower. But he ran behind a big line and big fullback. We have Armah and good sized line 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You work with what ya got, and we’ve got plenty of diverse packages.  The one I can’t  wait to see is usually described in pass rushing defensive terms...our NASCAR package, 11 personnel with three wrs, 1 te, and 1 rb.

Moore 4.42

Samuel 4.31

Smith 4.36

Olsen. 4.51

CMC 4.48

That’s goona keep DCs up at nite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone who is trying to pigeon hole Moore as this short route catch and run receiver is overlooking the fact that Maryland had a horrible situation at QB and they were simply trying to get the ball in the hands of their best player by any means necessary given their handicap at QB. 

I’m simply saying that we honestly don’t know what Moore is capable of as a complete WR right now but we do know that Norv and Smitty love him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I think everyone who is trying to pigeon hole Moore as this short route catch and run receiver is overlooking the fact that Maryland has a horrible situation at QB sand they were simply trying to get the ball in the hands of their best player by any means necessary given their handicap at QB. 

I’m simply saying that we honestly don’t know what Moore is capable of as a complete WR right now but we do know that Norv and Smitty love him.

They guy seems to be more than athletic enough to be a multi-faceted receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Huddler said:

Whats the difference between a power run game, and just a run game if its still getting 5 yards a pop regardless?  Is it just a coincidence that Norv has had big backs?

 

I mean, if it gets the safteys to cheap up, then it gets the safteys to cheat up...

 

dont see why it has to be a big guy

Power Run game does not necessarily mean you have a big back, no. 

I still believe a lot of Panther fans will be impressed with the ability of CMC. Running between the tackles will be made to look easy thanks to being able to spread out a defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RumHam said:

Emmitt Smith was overrated. 

Norv also had Michael Turner in his prime.

Michael Turner played one year under Norv and ran 71 times for 316 yards.  Nearly a fourth of those yards came on one 74 yard run. It was the next year when he went to Atlanta that he really broke out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norv isn't necessarily changing anything, he is simply taking the talent he is given and adapting it to his offensive scheme. Funchess is his big body wide receiver. He isn't close to being one, he is one. Olsen is his tight end and now he has 2 for third down and short yardage. CMC is his fast scat back and CAP is his power back. He has a bunch of weapons including Cam which gives him more flexibility. But that doesn't mean he won't run his familiar scheme. Plus these days no offense is purely one scheme or another, they are all an amalgamation of several systems.

Don't know why someone thinks he is changing before we see what he does in the preseason. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

 

I think everyone who is trying to pigeon hole Moore as this short route catch and run receiver is overlooking the fact that Maryland had a horrible situation at QB and they were simply trying to get the ball in the hands of their best player by any means necessary given their handicap at QB. 

 

I studied every game i could find online of Moore. 

Sure, I think he is capable of being an outside WR. Just not his rookie year.

His issue against press is all technique based. It can be coached. But it will be a process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

If you’re right we’ll have a new GM and coach

We very well might anyway depending on what new ownership wants. If they want to be safe they better make a helluva run this year and show new ownership that they’d be crazy to show them the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sml1950 said:

You work with what ya got, and we’ve got plenty of diverse packages.  The one I can’t  wait to see is usually described in pass rushing defensive terms...our NASCAR package, 4 wide and 1 rb.

Moore 4.42

Samuel 4.31

Smith 4.36

Byrd. 4.28

CMC 4.48

That’s goona keep DCs up at nite.

:shades: I call it the stretch and gut formation.

4 WO on go routes with CMC gutting the D underneath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherclaw said:

Power Run game does not necessarily mean you have a big back, no. 

I still believe a lot of Panther fans will be impressed with the ability of CMC. Running between the tackles will be made to look easy thanks to being able to spread out a defense.

Agreed

 

I think CAP will look good too. Has shown to be very powerful as a runner in the very small time hes had a legitimate opportunity. 

 

I honestly think we are set. Sure, get a good backup, but a BACKUP.  Snaps should not be taken away from these two. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...